Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 13;10(3):e0118961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118961

Table 4. Summary table of the data from studies included on orofacial clefts; the table depicts comparative data using fixed and random effects model.

Sub group Sample size (n) No of studies included Random effect model P value Fixed effect model P value
Overall prevalence 410,067 11 1.26 (1.07 to 1.45) 0.92 (0.92 to. 93)
Region wise prevalence 10
 North 13,932 2 0.85 (0.23 to 1.93) P <0.00001* 0.87 (0.86 to 0.88) P<0.00001*
 South 159,891 3 1.10 (0.33 to 1.87) 0.77 (0.76 to 0.79)
 East 126,266 1 0.70 (0.67 to 0.73) 0.70 (0.67 to 0.73)
 West 15,368 4 1.78 (1.5 to 2.05) 0.99 (0.98 to 1)
Time trends 11
 Before 1995 148,766 5 1 (0.55 to 1.44) P = 0.07 0.5 (0.49 to 0.52) P<0.00001 *
 After 1995 261,301 6 1.43 (1.31 to 1.55) 1 (1 to 1.01)
Gender 267,806 2
 Male 0.60 (0.02 to 1.18) P = 0.87 0.71 (0.70 to 0.73) P<0.00001 *
 Female 0.53 (0.02 to 1.09) 0.81 (0.80 to 0.82)

* Statistically significant