Table 2.
Predicting Electrodermal Reactivity during Adult Romantic Conflict Discussions from Maternal Sensitivity in Childhood
| B | SE | β | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | ||||
| Maternal sensitivity during childhood | −0.94 | 0.43 | −.33 | .03 |
| Step 2 | ||||
| Maternal sensitivity during childhood | −0.98 | 0.46 | −.36 | .02 |
| Target: observed relationship functioning | 0.05 | 0.13 | .07 | .70 |
| Partner: observed relationship functioning | 0.04 | 0.13 | .07 | .69 |
| Target: perceived relationship quality | −0.11 | 0.41 | −0.05 | .79 |
| Partner: perceived relationship quality | 0.13 | 0.56 | .04 | .82 |
| Step 3 Partner: observed relationship functioning | ||||
| Maternal sensitivity during childhood | −1.05 | 0.51 | −.38 | .04 |
| Target: observed relationship functioning | 0.16 | 0.13 | .22 | .19 |
| Partner: observed relationship functioning | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.01 | .96 |
| Target: perceived relationship quality | −0.04 | 0.38 | −.02 | .92 |
| Partner: perceived relationship quality | 0.08 | 0.53 | .02 | .88 |
| Gender | 1.43 | 0.54 | .40 | .01 |
| Ethnicity | −0.92 | 0.60 | −.24 | .12 |
| Maternal education | 0.08 | 0.30 | .07 | .78 |
| Childhood socioeconomic status | 0.03 | 0.04 | .12 | .55 |
Note Gender was coded 1=female, 0=male. Ethnicity was coded 1=White, 0=non-White.