Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 21;3:e03528. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03528

Table 3.

Summary of tagged annotated smORFs

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03528.013

Localization Peptidomic evidence # aa RPKM Coverage TE Phast Cons
CG32230 Mitochondrial Yes 83 539.2 1.00 3.05 0.54
CG14482 Mitochondrial Yes 57 600.0 1.00 1.09 0.72
CG44242 Mitochondrial Yes 70 152.9 0.97 1.75 0.66
CG7630 Mitochondrial Yes 90 702.2 1.00 1.05 0.64
CG33199 Mitochondrial No 79 95.5 1.00 1.17 0.59
CG32582 Mitochondrial No 52 16.5 0.57 2.82 0.51
sclA Other cytoplasmic NA 28 NA NA NA NA
CG12384 Other cytoplasmic Yes 96 205.6 1.00 1.37 0.71
CG33774 Other cytoplasmic No 40 115.3 1.00 1.13 0.73
CG33170 Other cytoplasmic No 71 84.2 0.84 0.75 0.60
CG34200 Limited Yes 52 331.7 1.00 1.66 0.54
CG32267 Limited Yes 49 82.5 0.97 1.13 0.70
CG33155 Limited No 60 33.8 0.64 0.88 0.67
tal-B None NA 49 NA NA NA NA

Details of the Poly-Ribo-Seq and transfection translation assay results for the FLAG-tagged smORFs, with RPKM, coverage and TE values. Previously corroborated smORFs (according to Figure 1A) are in bold. Scl is a positive control and tal-B is a negative control, but both are not endogenously transcribed in S2 cells, hence ‘NA’ Polysomal Ribo-Seq metrics and Peptidomic evidence.