Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 12.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2014 Dec 24;519(7542):233–236. doi: 10.1038/nature14024

Extended Data Table 1. P values for data in main figures.

The uncorrected P values for each main figure panel and its associated comparison are indicated. The number of comparisons used for post-hoc Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons are also shown.

Figure Comparison P value
(uncorrected)
Number of
Comparisons
Figure Comparison P value
(uncorrected)
Number of
Comparisons


1d 6 vs. 1 fly 3.37 × 10−6 4 3h Tnt vs. Gal4>Tnt 1.28 × 10−4 3
12 vs. 1 fly 4.20 × 10−13 Gal4 vs. Gal4>Tnt 2.74 × 10−4
18 vs. 1 fly 4.96 × 10−21 Inactive Tnt vs. Gal4>Tnt 1.10 × 10−3
24 vs. 1 fly 6.77 × 10 18
4a Inactive Tnt, 18 vs. 1 fly 2.99 × 10−6 1
2d 12 vs. 6 flies 1.67 × 10−11 1 Tnt, 18 vs. 1 fly 5.54 × 10−1 1
18 vs. 12 flies 3.91 × 10−11 1
24 vs. 18 flies 4.50 × 10−11 1 4b Inactive Tnt, 18 vs. 1 fly 3.90 × 10−8 1
Tnt, 18 vs. 1 fly 3.75 × 10−2 1
2e 6 flies, Enc. vs. Iso. 3.18 × 10−4 1
12 flies, Enc vs. Iso. 3.78 × 10−6 1 4c nompC+/−, 18 vs. 1 fly 1.12 × 10−5 1
18 flies, Enc vs. Iso. 1.30 × 10−3 1 nompC−/−, 18 vs. 1 fly 1.62 × 10−1 1
2g 6 vs. 1 fly 3.69 × 10−8 4 4d 3 vs. 1 fly 3.98 × 10−2 3
12 vs. 1 fly 1.87 × 10−17 6 vs. 1 fly 2.98 × 10−9
18 vs. 1 fly 4.99 × 10−19 12 vs. 1 fly 3.12 × 10−25
24 vs. 1 fly 2.27 × 10−16
4e 3 vs. 1 fly 8.87 × 10−18 3
3a Light vs. Dark 1.73 × 10−2 5 6 vs. 1 fly 1.76 × 10−18
Anosmic vs. Dark 4.27 × 10−1 12 vs. 1 fly 3.60 × 10−38
nanchung vs. Dark 1.73 × 10−2
piezo vs. Dark 1.13 × 10−2
nompC vs. Dark 1.00 × 10−3
3f oe+ vs. oe 5.55 × 10−1 1