Table 1. Review of studies that estimate the heritability of female preference.
Species | Order | Na | Cue typeb | Genetic modelc | Mean | s.d. or s.e.d | ne | Study |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No choice trials | ||||||||
Drosophila melanogaster | Diptera | 1 | Male | Isofemale | 0.80 | 0.16 | 4 | Narraway et al. (2010) |
Sepsis cynipsea | Diptera | 1 | Male | Half-sib | 0.37 | 1 | Muhlhauser and Blanckenhorn (2004) | |
Pectinophora gossypiella | Lepidoptera | 1 | Synthetic | Selection | 0.16 | 0.02 | 1 | Collins and Carde (1990)f |
Choice trials | ||||||||
Taeniopygia guttata | Passeriformes | 2 | Male | Full-sib | 0.10 | 0.14 | 1 | Schielzeth et al. (2010) |
Gasterosteus aculeatus | Gasterosteiformes | 2 | Male | Full-sib | 0.43 | 0.37 | 1 | Bakker (1993) |
Utetheisa ornatrix | Lepidoptera | 2 | Male | OP | 0.51 | 0.11 | 1 | Iyengar et al. (2002) |
Drosophila bunnanda | Diptera | 2 | Male | Half-sib | nag | na | na | McGuigan et al. (2008) |
Achroia grisella | Lepidoptera | 2 | Synthetic | Half-sib | 0.21 | 0.13 | 1 | Jang and Greenfield (2000) |
Taeniopygia guttata | Passeriformes | 8 | Male | Animal | 0.03 | 0.05 | 3 | Forstmeier et al. (2004) |
Poecilia reticulata | Cyprinodontiformes | 12 | Male | Half-sib | 0.05 | 0.08 | 14 | Brooks and Endler (2001) |
Poecilia reticulata | Cyprinodontiformes | 5 | Male | Selection | 0.00 | 0.09 | 2 | Hall et al. (2004) |
Nauphoeta cinerea | Blattodea | 2 | Male | Threshold | 1.02 | 0.28 | 1 | Moore (1990) |
Drosophila simulans | Diptera | 2 | Male | Threshold | 0.26 | 0.11 | 1 | Sharma et al. (2010) |
Cadra cautella | Lepidoptera | 2 | Synthetic | Threshold | −0.03 | 0.06 | 1 | Allison et al. (2008) |
Teleogryllus oceanicus | Orthoptera | 2 | Synthetic | Threshold | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3 | Simmons (2004) |
Pectinophora gossypiella | Lepidoptera | Multiple | Synthetic | OP | 0.26 | 0.25 | 6 | Collins and Carde (1989) |
Achroia grisella | Lepidoptera | Multiple | Synthetic | Half-sib | 0.23 | 0.11 | 8 | Zhou et al. (2011) |
Achroia grisella | Lepidoptera | Multiple | Synthetic | Full-sib | 0.31 | 0.13 | 2 | Rodriguez and Greenfield (2003)f |
Gryllus texensis | Orthoptera | Multiple | Synthetic | OP | 0.40 | 0.11 | 2 | Gray and Cade (1999) |
Free-ranging population | ||||||||
Ficedula albicollis | Passeriformes | Unknown | NA | Animal | 0.05 | 0.01 | 2 | Husby et al. (2012)f |
Ficedula albicollis | Passeriformes | Unknown | NA | Animal | 0.03 | 1 | Qvarnström et al. (2006)f |
Except where noted (footnote f), authors define the trait as ‘preference'.
N: Number of males presented to a female. ‘Multiple' refers to the set of synthetic cues used to estimate female preference.
Refers to whether female is presented with one or more males or with a synthetic cue (pheromone, song).
Animal=animal model. OP=offspring on parent regression.
Standard error presented when there was only one estimate, otherwise standard deviation of estimates.
Number of estimates.
Collins and Carde (1989) define the response as ‘increased responsiveness', while Rodriguez and Greenfield (2003), Qvarnström et al. (2006) and Husby et al (2012) use the term ‘choice'.
Genetic variance but not heritability of preference estimated.