Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 24;113(6):1850–1861. doi: 10.1152/jn.00799.2014

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Properties of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (mIPSPs) recorded from interneurons of different subtypes. A and B: representative examples of mIPSPs recorded from FS and RS non-FS neurons. C, top: examples of average mIPSP waveforms from FS (gray trace) and RS non-FS (black trace) neurons showing the characteristic difference in amplitude. Bottom: bar graphs summarizing mIPSP amplitude. The difference between group means was significant (P < 0.05, single-factor ANOVA). In this and all other figures, groups with a different letter are significantly different [P < 0.05, Fisher least significant difference (LSD) test]. D, top: the average waveforms in C normalized to the same amplitude illustrate the differences in decay time course. Bottom: bar graph summarizing mIPSP decay time constant. The difference between group means was significant (P < 0.05, single-factor ANOVA). E: cumulative probability distribution histograms of mIPSP amplitude. In this and all other comparisons of cumulative distribution, differences between groups were assessed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests with Bonferroni correction. The distributions differed significantly between all groups (P < 0.001). F: cumulative probability distribution histograms of mIPSP decay time constant. The distributions differed significantly between all groups (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P < 0.001).