Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 24;113(6):1712–1726. doi: 10.1152/jn.00419.2014

Table 2.

Comparison between the number of action potentials, input resistance (Rin), and current threshold (Itrh) in type I and type II DG granule cells

Wild-type
Tg2576
Tg2576 + RSG
Wild-type + RSG
Type I, n = 19 Type II, n = 8 P < Type I, n = 18 Type II, n = 13 P < Type I, n = 26 Type II, n = 11 P < Type I, n = 16 Type II, n = 8 P <
# of APs at 90 pA current step 14.1 ± 1.3 8.8 ± 0.9 0.005 13.4 ± 0.8 10.6 ± 0.9 0.05 14.5 ± 0.8 8.4 ± 0.6 0.005 14.25 ± 0.8 7.9 ± 1.1 0.005
# of APs at 220 pA current step 5.4 ± 0.8 17.3 ± 1.5 0.005 7.3 ± 0.9 21.2 ± 0.9 0.005 7 ± 0.9 17.9 ± 0.8 0.005 7.1 ± 0.9 16.5 ± 1.2 0.005
Rin, MΩ 443.3 ± 19.9 297.2 ± 13.6 0.005 419.1 ± 16.4 345.7 ± 14.9 0.005 440.6 ± 11.7 342.2 ± 22.4 0.005 444.5 ± 16.5 377.3 ± 12.9 0.005
Itrh, pA 25.3 ± 2.7 41.3 ± 5.5 0.05 30.6 ± 2.7 36.9 ± 4.3 0.2 26.9 ± 1.9 41.8 ± 2.9 0.01 30 ± 2 42.5 ± 6.5 0.05

Type I cells were compared with type II cells for wild-type, RSG-treated wild-type, Tg2576, or RSG-treated Tg2576. Data are mean ± SE. P values obtained with Student's t-test.

DG, dentate gyrus; APs, action potentials.