Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 16.
Published in final edited form as: Personal Disord. 2014 Jun 16;5(4):369–379. doi: 10.1037/per0000077

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Results are shown for the gaze-congruent (right) and gaze-incongruent trials (left), controlling for performance in neutral trials. Raw psychopathy scores, estimated from the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (Hare, 2003), were standardized (z scores; displayed point estimates are ± 1 SD from the mean). Error bars represent the standard errors for the point estimates. There was a significant psychopathy by trial type interaction. Offenders high on psychopathy compared with those low on psychopathy, controlling for level of externalizing, were more accurate on gaze-congruent trials (* denotes p < .05), but there were no psychopathy-related difference on gaze-incongruent trials.