Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 16;7(3):237–246. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i3.237

Table 1.

Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy-data from literature (adapted after[27])

Ref. n Eckardt score (before/after) LES pressure (before/after) Efficacy Time of follow-up (mo) Patients with recurrent dysphagia
Inoue et al[13] 17 10/1.3 52.4/19 100% 5 0
von Renteln et al[30] 16 7.8/0.7 27.2/11.8 94% 3 1
Costamagna et al[31] 11 7.1/1.1 45.1/16.9 100% 3 0
Swanstrom et al[32] 18 6/0 45/16.8 94% 6 1
Ren et al[33] 119 -/<3 29.4/13.5 91.7% 10.4 -
Hungness et al[34] 18 7/1 19/9 89% 6 2
Inoue et al[35] 300 6.13/1.33 27.3/13.4 98% 12 5
Chiu et al[36] 16 5.5/0 43.6/29.8 100% 3 0
Lee et al[37] 13 6.4/0.4 30.3/15.3 100% 6.9 0
Minami et al[38] 28 6.7/0.7 71.2/21 100% 16 0
Verlaan et al[39] 10 8/1 20.5/6.8 - 16 -
Stavropoulos et al[40] 66 7.9/0.2 42.5/15.4 96% 13 2
Zhou et al[41] 205 Relief in 199/205 - 97% 8.5 3
Von Renteln et al[42] 70 6.9/1 27.6/8.9 82% 12 9
Teitelbaum et al[43] 41 7/1 22/9 92% 12 -

LES: Lower esophageal sphincter.