Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 22;3(2):357–362. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.480

Table I.

Main characteristics and results of the eligible studies.

First authors (Refs.) Journal Year Country Methods Duration of follow-up (months) Cut-off point (high/low) No. of patients No. of deceased/alive/lost HR estimation Quality assessment (0–8)
de Silva Rudland (15) Clin Cancer Res 2006 UK IHC 216 ≥1% (143/148) 291 RR+95 %CI 5
Kim (16) J Korean Med Sci 1998 Korea IHC 160 儥5% (221/32) 253 52/153/38 RR+95 %CI 5
Ribeiro-Silva A and Oliveira da Costa (25) Int J Biol Markers 2008 Brazil IHC ≥1% (65/35) 100 5
Wang (31) Radiology 2010 China IHC Score ≥2 (92/49) 141 7
Rudland (17) Cancer Res 2002 UK IHC 228 >5% (221/112) 333 168/165/- RR+95 %CI 6
Pang (18) Cancer Epidemiol 2013 China IHC 92 Score ≥2 (119/51) 170 HR+95 %CI 4
Wang (19) Eur J Clin Invest 2008 China IHC 62.4 Score >4 (33/84) 117 Survival curves 5
Tuck (9) Int J Cancer 1998 Canada IHC 195.6 Score >4 (11/143) 154 45/109/- Survival curves 4

IHC, immunohistochemistry; RR, risk ratio; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.