Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Autism Dev Disord. 2014 Mar;44(3):694–702. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1901-0

Table 2. Associations between % fixation duration and features of the broad autism phenotype, N = 44.

Intercept Condition ME BAPQ ME BAPQ × condition RoSa

Estimate (SE) Estimate (SE) Estimate (SE) Estimate (SE) Upper limit % Above cutoff
Dependent variable: % fixation duration to face AOI
 BAPQ total 34.84 (13.49) −13.51 (4.71)** −4.36 (4.59) 3.43 (1.63)* 3.29 11.36
 BAPQ aloof 23.25 (9.11) −9.90 (3.11)** −0.19 (3.10) 2.22 (1.08)* 3.46 11.36
 BAPQ rigidity 43.62 (9.94) −10.56 (4.46)* −6.86 (2.99)* 2.15 (1.41)
 BAPQ prag. lang. 23.59 (13.03) −6.75 (4.84) −0.32 (4.81) 1.04 (1.84)
Dependent variable: % fixation duration to target AOI
 BAPQ total 53.113 (15.69) 19.84 (7.76)* 4.86 (5.28) −4.88 (2.61)+ 3.39 11.36
 BAPQ Aloof 67.18 (10.75) 15.34 (5.09)** −0.23 (3.60) −3.41 (1.66)* 3.53 9.09
 BAPQ rigidity 40.71 (12.366) 17.58 (7.55)* 8.49 (3.82)* −3.70 (2.36)
 BAPQ prag. lang. 67.08 (15.31) 6.54 (6.77) −0.19 (5.65) −0.09 (2.55)

ME main effect, SE standard error, RoS region of significance, BAPQ prag. lang BAPQ pragmatic language

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

+

p = .06

a

Region of significance analysis only computed for significant, or marginally significant BAPQ × Condition terms