Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 16.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Oct 25;112(1):110–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.011

Table 1.

Association between findings on pathologic examination of LEEP or cone biopsy specimens and presence or absence of residual disease at radical hysterectomy*

Factor No residual disease (n = 22) Residual disease (n = 20) P value
Histology 0.74
    Squamous 13 (59) 14 (70)
    Adenocarcinoma 7 (32) 5 (25)
    Adenosquamous 2 (9) 1 (5)
Depth of invasion 0.15
    > 4.0 mm 3 (14) 7 (35)
    ≤ 4.0 mm 19 (86) 13 (65)
LVSI present 12 (55) 5 (25) 0.07
Positive ECC results 7 (32) 11 (55) 0.66
Positive nodes 1 (4) 0 (0) 1.0
Grade 0.95
    1 3 (14) 3 (15)
    2 8 (36) 10 (50)
    3 6 (27) 6 (30)
LEEP/cone biopsy margin status <0.001
    Positive 8 (36) 16 (80)
    Negative 10 (45) 1 (5)
    Unknown 4 (19) 3 (15)

LVSI – lymph-vascular space invasion; ECC – endocervical curettage; LEEP – loop electroexcisional procedure.

*

Values in table are numbers (percentages) of patients.