Table 3.

Mean intensities for connectivity maps calculated for each predefined ROI used as a seed region.

ROI name	mean resting connectivity	Mean DTI connectivity	Mean correlation (individual subjects)	Correlation between composite maps
Angular_L	−0.027#	12.10#	0.06	0.39
Angular_R	0.008*	46.31	0.11**	0.43
CingAnt	0.018**	64.26*	0.23**	0.55
CingPost	−0.020	91.58*	−0.01	0.24
Cingulate	0.084**	96.33*	0.23**	0.52
Cuneus	−0.049##	37.13#	0.12**	0.45
IFG_L	0.004**	38.86#	0.10**	0.35
IFG_R	0.003*	65.69	0.21**	0.38
IPL_L	0.009**	15.55#	0.10**	0.45
IPL_R	0.047**	69.21	0.14**	0.42
Insula_L	0.051**	84.94*	0.17**	0.49
Insula_R	0.047*	63.95	0.25**	0.47
Lingual	−0.075#	34.08#	0.15**	0.45
MFG_L	0.008*	56.47	0.15**	0.42
MFG_R	0.011*	71.72*	0.25**	0.47
MOcG_L	−0.171#	38.36#	−0.04	−0.11
MOcG_R	−0.123#	13.56#	−0.01	−0.14
MTG_L	−0.067#	35.40#	0.07*	0.26
MTG_R	−0.040#	19.27#	0.08**	0.36
MedFG	0.005	67.37	0.20**	0.45
Postcentral_L	0.003	27.37#	0.09**	0.32
Postcentral_R	0.019*	90.23*	0.15**	0.31
Precuneus	0.032*	68.14	0.14**	0.53
TG_L	−0.035#	22.51#	0.10**	0.39
TG_R	−0.018	48.86	0.15**	0.35
Thalamus	0.023	113.63*	0.22**	0.58

First two columns represent the mean (averaged between all subject, across the brain) strength of anatomical (DTI) and functional (RSTC) connectivity. Those connectivity strengths were compared to the mean of whole brain gray matter as a null hypothesis. Significantly increased correlation is represented as ** for p<0.001, and * for p<0.01 significance levels. Correlations significantly smaller than mean are marked as ^## p<0.001 and ^# p<0.01. The third column represents the spatial or increased correlation between connectivity maps calculated for each subject separately and compared to null hypothesis of zero correlation. The fourth column shows correlations between composite (averaged between subjects) maps of connectivity. Spatial correlations are calculated as partial correlation with effect of geometrical distance excluded.