Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2013 Apr 9;9(4):2020–2034. doi: 10.1021/ct3010485

Table 1.

abs_e (kcal/mol), rel_e (kcal/mol) and eff_rad_rmsd (Å) to PB results for each training set after optimization, compared to GB-OBC and GB-Neck models. w is the weighting factor for each component. The objective function for training is the sum of the weighted contributions from each column.

Ala10_set_1 Ala10_set_1 trpzip2 trpzip2 3Ai3 3Ai3 RAAE RAAE
abs_e rel_e abs_e rel_e abs_e rel_e abs_e rel_e
w=10 w=10 w=1 w=10 w=1 w=10 w=10 w=10
GB-OBC 1.1 1.6 9.5 4.8 7.1 4.5 1.5 1.3
GB-Neck 2.7 2.3 8.3 7.0 10.6 4.1 1.1 1.1
GB-Neck2 0.8 1.0 2.8 3.9 3.7 3.7 0.9 1.2
HP36 HP36 HP1113 Ala10_set_2 obj_funct
abs_e rel_e eff_rad_rmsd eff_rad_rmsd
w=1 w=10 w=50 w=250
GB-OBC 21.6 6.5 1.8 0.16 381.2
GB-Neck 28.3 5.1 2.3 0.19 444.7
GB-Neck2 4.3 4.8 1.5 0.10 273.8