Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Diabet Med. 2014 Nov 27;32(4):513–520. doi: 10.1111/dme.12618

Table 4.

Change in waist circumference from baseline to follow-up, in Mauritian men and women, by tertile of pulse consumption at baseline

Change (95% CI) in waist circumference, cm

N Tertile 1 Tertile 2 Tertile 3
Model 1

All 794 1.0 (0.3, 1.7) 0.4 (−0.2, 1.1) −0.3 (−1.0, 0.3)
  Men 374 2.2 (1.3, 3.1) 1.2 (0.2, 2.1) 1.3 (0.4, 2.2)
  Women 420 −0.2 (−1.2, 0.8) −0.2 (−1.2, 0.7) −1.6 (−2.4, −0.7)*
Model 2
All 788 0.8 (0.1, 1.5) 0.4 (−0.2, 1.1) −0.1 (−0.8, 0.5)
  Men 373 2.1 (1.1, 3.0) 1.1 (0.2, 2.1) 1.5 (0.5, 2.4)
  Women 415 −0.3 (−1.4, 0.7) −0.2 (−1.2, 0.7) −1.5 (−2.3, −0.6)

Model 1 adjusted for age at baseline, and model 2 for age at baseline plus variables associated with energy-adjusted consumption of pulses at baseline and/or the follow-up outcome in men and/or women (ethnicity, baseline occupational physical activity, smoking, energy-adjusted consumption of vegetables, fiber, potatoes, canned fish and beef).

Significantly different from tertile 1 (P<0.05).

*

Significantly different from tertiles 1 and 2 (P<0.05).