Table 3. Model 2 — Risk factors associated with Avian Influenza type H9N2 infection on commercial poultry farms in Pakistan based on a backward manual stepwise selection process on all variables available in Table 1 except distance to the nearest case farm.
Potential risk factors | Levels | Regression coefficient | Standard error | Odds ratios | 95% CI for OR | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Distance from the main road | >0.5km | 1 | ||||
≤0.5km | 1.5244 | 0.7328 | 4.59 a | 1.09–19.3 | 0.038 | |
Cover on the water tank | No water tank | 1 | ||||
No cover | 0.8490 | 0.9830 | 2.34 | 0.34–16.1 | 0.388 | |
Yes cover | -1.1604 | 0.7767 | 0.3130 b*¶ | 0.068–1.44 | 0.135 | |
History of Infectious Bursal Disease in the flock | No | 1 | ||||
Yes | 1.0979 | 0.3741 | 3.00 c | 1.44–6.24 | 0.003 | |
Selling of birds/eggs directly to the live bird retail stalls | No | 1 | ||||
Yes | 2.3598 | 0.5847 | 10.6 d | 3.37–33.3 | <0.001 |
R2 = 0.235 (out of possible 0.5)
aThe odds of having the distance from the main road <0.5km was 4.59 (CI 95%: 1.09–19.3) times higher than the odds of exposure in the control farms.
b*¶Non significant protective factor, i.e odds of having cover on the water storage tank on case farm was 0.313 (CI 95%: 0.068–1.44) times less than the odds of having cover on the water storage tank on control farms.
cThe odds of having history of infection with IBD for case was 3.00 (95% CI: 1.44–6.24) times greater than the odds of exposure in the control farm.
dThe odds of selling the birds/and or eggs directly to live bird retail shops was 10.6 (CI 95%: 3.37–33.3) times more than the odds of exposure in the control farms.