Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0120210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120210

Table 1. Proportion of pan-Plasmodium positive samples detected by each PCR compared with the ‘final positive’ samples.

PCR methods Positivity a P b Kappa b Sensitivity b Specificity b
n (%; 95% CI) % (95% CI) % (95% CI)
18S-nPCR 32 (1.1; 0.7–1.5) <0.01 0.65 49.2 (36.6–61.9) 100 (99.9–100)
18S-qPCR-R 441 (14.8; 13.6–16.1) <0.01 0.17 76.9 (64.8–86.5) 86.6 (85.3–87.8)
18S-qPCR-K 69 (2.3; 1.8–2.9) 0.48 0.86 89.2 (79.1–95.6) 99.6 (99.3–99.8)
cytb-nPCR 61 (2.0; 1.6–2.6) 0.13 0.97 93.8 (85.0–98.3) 100 (99.9–100)
cytb-qPCR 67 (2.3; 1.7–2.8) 0.50 0.98 100 (94.5–100) 99.9 (99.8–100)
‘final positive' 65 (2.2; 1.7–2.8) - - - -

a Proportion of samples positive in the pan-Plasmodium screening of field samples (N = 2977).

b The p value, kappa value, sensitivity and specificity were calculated by comparing individual PCRs with the ‘final positive’ samples defined as positivity in at least two of the five PCR methods.