Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychopharmacol. 2012 Oct 31;27(2):192–202. doi: 10.1177/0269881112464828

Table 2.

Estimates of antagonist potency, derived from isolated guinea pig ileum data, calculated using classical Schild plot, the Gaddum-Schild method, Schild’s equation and antagonist affinity (pKB) determined using the Gaddum method.

Ligand;
receptor
Slope of
Schild plot
(+ 95% CI)a
pA2
Schild plot
(+ 95% CI)
pA2
Gaddum-Schild
(+ 95% CI)b
pA2
Schild’s
equation c
pKB
Gaddum
NorBNI
κ 1.46
(0.32 to 2.59)
8.30
(10.30 to 7.72)
8.51
(8.00 to 9.02)
8.20 8.75
5’-AMN
κ 1.16
(0.44 to 1.87)
7.43
(7.86 to 7.07)
7.44
(7.77 to 7.93)
7.45 7.26
μ 1.21
(−0.11 to 2.55)
7.62
(6.58 to 9.12)
7.67
(6.93 to 8.42)
7.33 7.34
5’-MABN
κ 0.95
(0.21 to 1.68)
8.18
(9.81 to 7.53)
8.09
(7.29 to 8.89)
8.30 8.43
μ 0.46
(−0.29 to 1.21)
7.85
(6.58 to 9.12)
8.09
(6.81 to 9.38)
8.23 8.94

Values expressed are mean ± 95% confidence interval of n=4 tissues, except where derived as single values.

a

For Schild plots the regression was linear and the slope was within 95% confidence interval for unity for all antagonists.

b

Gaddum–Schild model of orthosteric competitive antagonism was used to re-fit the data to a linear model constraining the slope to a value of exactly 1 and the pA2 determined.

c

Apparent pA2 estimates derived from Schild’s equation (pA2 = log (DR-1) - log [antagonist] and the lowest positive log (DR-1) value. were calculated from the lowest positive log (DR-1) value that corresponded to a significant rightward shift in the agonist pEC50 in the presence of the antagonist.