Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 26;(484):25–52. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.484.9132

Table 3.

Observed sequence divergence (%) between pairs of echinorhynchid species for the 28S rDNA (below the diagonal) and COI sequence data (above the diagonal).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. Acanthocephalus lucii 36.1 33.3 34.5 32.8 34.2 34.4 34.0 34.0 34.7
2. Echinorhynchus salmonis 18.5 29.7 27.7 28.7 29.7 29.7 29.4 28.7 28.9
3. Echinorhynchus cinctulus 31.1 23.1 21.7 22.2 21.5 21.7 22.9 22.9 23.1
4. Echinorhynchus brayi 19.1 15.5 6.6 16.8 17.4 17.3 19.0 17.1 18.0
5. Echinorhynchus truttae 19.3 15.3 7.5 0.8 8.2 8.4 9.1 8.9 8.9
6. Echinorhynchus gadi sp. I (Baltic Sea) 19.2 15.4 7.1 0.5 0.3 0.2 7.2 6.5 6.3
7. Echinorhynchus gadi sp. I (White Sea) 19.2 15.4 7.1 0.5 0.3 0.0* 7.4 6.5 6.3
8. Echinorhynchus gadi sp. III 19.2 15.4 7.1 0.5 0.3 0.0* 0.0* 3.3 3.1
9. Echinorhynchus bothniensis 19.2 15.4 7.1 0.5 0.3 0.0* 0.0* 0.0* 1.5
10. Echinorhynchus 'bothniensis' 19.2 15.4 7.1 0.5 0.3 0.0* 0.0* 0.0* 0.0*
*

sequences are identical