Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2013 Apr-Jun;27(2):187–191. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318265bcc1

TABLE 1.

Sample Size Requirements to Detect a Treatment Effect Using ADL Total Versus IRT Scoring, as Estimated From the Training (HC Trial) and Validation (DHA Trial) Data Sets

Trial Length (mo) N/arm
%-Reduction
HC
DHA
ADL IRT ADL IRT HC DHA
12 486 452 490 442 7.1% 9.8%
18 322 274 341 282 15% 17.4%
24 267 214 291 228 19.8% 21.7%

Both N/arm and %-Reduction assume no dropout and equal allocation.

ADL indicates activity of daily living; DHA, the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) docosahexaenoic acid trial; HC, the ADCS homocysteine trial on which the IRT model was trained; IRT, item-response theory; N/arm, sample size per arm, to detect a 25% reduction in the mean rate of decline, with observations every 6 months, power=0.8, 2-tailed significance level=0.05; %-Reduction, the percentage reduction in required sample size for IRT score versus ADL total scoring.