TABLE 1.
Sample Size Requirements to Detect a Treatment Effect Using ADL Total Versus IRT Scoring, as Estimated From the Training (HC Trial) and Validation (DHA Trial) Data Sets
Trial Length (mo) | N/arm
|
%-Reduction
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HC
|
DHA
|
|||||
ADL | IRT | ADL | IRT | HC | DHA | |
12 | 486 | 452 | 490 | 442 | 7.1% | 9.8% |
18 | 322 | 274 | 341 | 282 | 15% | 17.4% |
24 | 267 | 214 | 291 | 228 | 19.8% | 21.7% |
Both N/arm and %-Reduction assume no dropout and equal allocation.
ADL indicates activity of daily living; DHA, the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) docosahexaenoic acid trial; HC, the ADCS homocysteine trial on which the IRT model was trained; IRT, item-response theory; N/arm, sample size per arm, to detect a 25% reduction in the mean rate of decline, with observations every 6 months, power=0.8, 2-tailed significance level=0.05; %-Reduction, the percentage reduction in required sample size for IRT score versus ADL total scoring.