Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Nurs Health. 2015 Jan 25;38(2):102–114. doi: 10.1002/nur.21643

Table 1.

High risk versus low risk comparisons by study phase and units.

Intervention Unit Patients

High Risk Low Risk
Control Phase (n=54) Experimental Phase (n=64) Control Phase (n=122) Experimental Phase (n=164)

Age (M, SD) 66.13 (16.52) 64.13 (15.75) 59.66 (15.89) 60.09 (14.77)
Race (%)
 White 57.41 60.94 71.31 68.90
 Black 25.93 29.69 17.21 18.29
Gender (%)
 female 51.85 40.63 39.34 33.54
LOS (M, SD) 8.09 (5.49) 6.80 (5.69) 3.61 (3.69) 3.12 (2.70)
D2S2 score (M, SD) 4.91 (1.20)a 4.40 (0.90)a 1.61 (0.86) 1.60 (0.78)

Non-intervention Unit Patients

High Risk Low Risk
Control Phase (n=818) Experimental Phase (n=923) Control Phase (n=1822) Experimental Phase (n=2299)

Age (M, SD) 64.78 (16.81) 65.72 (17.67) 53.27 (16.33) 53.85 (16.26)
Race (%)
 White 46.09 48.00 55.71 55.72
 Black 46.09 43.34 34.03 35.54
Gender (%)
 female 54.89 53.20 51.65 51.33
LOS (M, SD) 7.15 (6.48)a 5.21 (4.06)a 4.20 (3.91)b 3.74 (3.24)b
D2S2 score (M, SD) 4.57 (1.12) 4.45 (0.97) 1.63 (0.84) 1.63 (0.84)
a

p-value <0.001

b

p-value <0.05

Length of Stay (LOS)