Table 4.
Fruit/Vegetable Intake |
Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity |
Screen Timed |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
95% CI for Adjusted OR |
95% CI for Adjusted OR |
95% CI for Adjusted OR |
||||||||||
Variable | Adjustedc OR | Lower | Upper | p | Adjustedc OR | Lower | Upper | p | Adjustedc OR | Lower | Upper | p |
Regression modelsa | ||||||||||||
Race/ethnicityb | ||||||||||||
Black, non-Latino | 1.12 | .60 | 2.1 | .72 | .37 | .14 | .97 | .04 | 1.53 | .80 | 2.91 | .20 |
White, Latino | .71 | .36 | 1.38 | .31 | .43 | .17 | 1.08 | .07 | .64 | .36 | 1.15 | .14 |
Multi-race | 1.63 | .78 | 3.40 | .20 | 1.44 | .61 | 3.43 | .41 | 1.53 | .70 | 3.34 | .29 |
Asian | 2.51 | .97 | 6.51 | .06 | .20 | .03 | 1.61 | .13 | 1.82 | .57 | 5.85 | .31 |
White, non-Latino | ref | ref | ref | |||||||||
Genderb | ||||||||||||
Female | .70 | .43 | 1.13 | .15 | .29 | .15 | .56 | .001 | .43 | .26 | .72 | .001 |
Weight statusb | ||||||||||||
Overweight/obese | 1.50 | .93 | 2.41 | .10 | 1.17 | .61 | 2.2 | .64 | 1.01 | .63 | 1.62 | .96 |
Interaction termsc | ||||||||||||
Race/Ethnicity × Weight Status | ||||||||||||
Black, Non-Latino × Over-weight/Obese | .46 | .13 | 1.63 | .23 | .17 | .02 | 1.90 | .15 | .73 | .20 | 2.72 | .64 |
White, Latino × Overweight/Obese | .45 | .12 | 1.73 | .25 | .89 | .14 | 5.55 | .90 | .71 | .22 | 2.35 | .58 |
Gender × Weight Status | ||||||||||||
Gender × Overweight/Obese | .92 | .31 | 2.75 | .88 | 2.49 | .58 | 10.74 | .22 | .89 | .29 | 2.73 | .84 |
Note. N = 384.
Main effects model. Fruit/vegetable intake, R2 = .051, Homer and Lemeshow test: χ2 = 14.16, df = 8, p = .078. Physical activity, R2 = .129, Homer and Lemeshow test: χ2 = 10.36, df = 8, p = .241. Screen time, R2 = .076, Homer and Lemeshow test: χ2 = 1.06, df = 9, p = .998.
Race/ethnicity, gender, and weight status adjusted for the others.
Multi-race or Asian subgroups were not included in the interaction models due to small sample sizes.
Lower values of indicate less total screen time (ST). x Denotes interaction.