Table 6.
Author | Year | Country | (n) | Method | Over-all satisfaction | Have it again | Shape | Position | Size | Consistency | Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Petersen [24] | 1992 | Ger | 119 | I | 93% | 93% | - | high 11% | 19% too large | 10% too firm | - |
14% too small | |||||||||||
Lynch [32] | 1992 | UK | 19 | Q | 79% | 95% | - | - | - | - | − |
Incrocci [33] | 2001 | NL | 22 | Q | 95% | 95% | - | - | - | 29% inconvenient | – |
Adshead [22] | 2001 | UK | 71 | Q | 73% | 90% | 32% not right | 27% not right | 37% inconvenient | - | 30% weight inconvenient |
Boy [28] | 2002 | Ger | 39 | Q | 97% | - | - | 3% too high | 36% not right | 3% too firm | partners’ rating: 55% satisfied |
Xylinas [34] | 2008 | F | 63 | Q | 96% | 96% | 12% not right | 3% not right | 5% too small | 12% too firm | 2% too cold |
Yossepowitch [21] | 2011 | Isr | 86 | I | 88% | 86% | - | 39% too high | 27% not right | 73% too firm | after 2005 better results |
I interview; Q questionnaire.