Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 13;15:16. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0

Table 6.

Survey of the literature – patients’ satisfaction with testicular implants

Author Year Country (n) Method Over-all satisfaction Have it again Shape Position Size Consistency Other
Petersen [24] 1992 Ger 119 I 93% 93% - high 11% 19% too large 10% too firm -
14% too small
Lynch [32] 1992 UK 19 Q 79% 95% - - - -
Incrocci [33] 2001 NL 22 Q 95% 95% - - - 29% inconvenient
Adshead [22] 2001 UK 71 Q 73% 90% 32% not right 27% not right 37% inconvenient - 30% weight inconvenient
Boy [28] 2002 Ger 39 Q 97% - - 3% too high 36% not right 3% too firm partners’ rating: 55% satisfied
Xylinas [34] 2008 F 63 Q 96% 96% 12% not right 3% not right 5% too small 12% too firm 2% too cold
Yossepowitch [21] 2011 Isr 86 I 88% 86% - 39% too high 27% not right 73% too firm after 2005 better results

I interview; Q questionnaire.