Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 17;10(3):e0117468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117468

Table 3. Statistic of significant SNPs in LW.

SNP SSC N A MAF B Var C p-value D Cluster
ALGA0018160 3 738 2.0 3.4 0.001** LW_2a
ASGA0023685 5 2272 20.9 0.8 0.02 LW_1
5 1719 22.3 1.2 0.01 LW_2
MARC0103593 5 2272 21.1 0.8 0.05 LW_1
5 1719 22.5 1.1 0.03 LW _2
MARC0104982 5 738 0.6 2.5 0.03 LW _2a
ALGA0055303 9 1719 0.6 1.3 0.004 LW _2
9 738 0.6 4.6 <0.001** LW _2a
ASGA0046811 10 738 21.3 2.6 0.02 LW _2a
MARC0070030 10 2272 0.8 0.9 0.007 LW _1
10 1719 0.8 1.1 0.01 LW _2
MARC0043480 10 938 16.3 2.2 0.01 LW _2b
DRGA0010601 10 938 17.6 1.9 0.04 LW _2b
ASGA0090608 10 738 5.7 2.4 0.05 LW _2a
H3GA0030853 11 1718 1.9 1.1 0.03 LW _2
MARC0006510 11 738 0.6 3.0 <0.001** LW _2a
ASGA0079878 18 738 0.6 3.5 0.0004** LW _2a

A Number of analysed animals,

B minor allele frequency (MAF),

C σ2 y* = Variance of the pre-corrected EBVs (Var, %),

D nominal p-value and corresponding significant thresholds:

**genome-wide significant (pgem < 0.05).