Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 2;2015:895717. doi: 10.1155/2015/895717

Table 6.

Comparison of intestinal propulsion rate (%) (n = 8).

Sham Control DCQD
IPR 32.09 ± 6.65 18.30 ± 3.82* 24.66 ± 4.54#

* P < 0.05 versus sham operation group. # P < 0.05 versus control group.