Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 18;6(2):311–315. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.311

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies evaluating subjects with osteoporosis that received dental implants

Ref. Study No. of subjects No. of implants No. of failures Follow up Site of implant insertion
Alsaadi et al[19] Retrospective 187 29 OPO/691 CTL 0 OPO/14 CTL 2 yr 388 max/332 mand
Alsaadi et al[20] Retrospective 19 OPO/393 CTL 68 OPO/1446 CTL 9 (13.24%) OPO/92 (6.3%) CTL 2 yr 816 max/698 mand
Amorim et al[24] Prospective 19 OPO/20 CTL 39 OPO/43 CTL 1 (2.56%) OPO/0 CTL 9 mo Mandible
de Souza et al[21] Retrospective 6 OPO/186 CTL 12 (50%) OPO/495 (71%) CTL 12 (50%) OPO/203 (29%) CTL Not mentioned 354 max/368 mand
With physiologic bone loss with additional bone loss
Dvorak et al[25] Cross-sectional 46 OPO/16 OPE/115 CTL 828 6 (13%) OPO/3 (18.75%) OPE/15 (13%) CTL 6 ± 4 yr 432 max/396 mand
Peri-implantitis 11 (23.9%) OPO/4 (25%) OPE/27 (23.5%) CTL
Eder et al[26] Case report 1 OPO 6 0 5 yr Mandible
Friberg et al[22] Retrospective 14 OPO 70 2 (2.85%) 3.4 yr 38 max/32 mand
Holahan et al[23] Retrospective 41 OPO/57 OPE/94 CTL 143 OPO/197 OPE/306 CTL 10 OPO/10 OPE/17 CTL 10 yr 268 max/378 mand

OPO: Subjects with osteoporosis; OPE: Subjects with osteopenia; CTL: Control: subjects with standard bone mineral density.