Table VI.

Associations between ‘Student Satisfaction’ and student outcomes of the ‘Choice, Control and Change project’

Dependent variablesa		βb	SE	t-ratio	P value
Fruit and vegetables-related variables
Behavior	Eating fruit and vegetablesc	0.24	0.11	2.18	0.031
Mediating variables	Intention to changed	0.19	0.08	2.45	0.015
	Outcome expectatione	0.19	0.04	8.46	<0.001***
	Self-efficacyf	0.23	0.05	4.34	<0.001***
Water related variables
Behavior	Drinking waterc	0.02	0.16	0.14	0.890
Mediating variables	Intention to changed	0.20	0.08	2.60	0.01
	Outcome expectatione	0.14	0.04	3.40	0.001**
	Self-efficacyf	0.07	0.05	1.45	0.147
Sweetened beverage-related variables
Behavior	Drinking sweetened beveragec	−0.26	0.13	−2.03	0.044
Mediating variables	Intention to changed	0.22	0.08	2.69	0.008
	Outcome expectatione	0.09	0.04	2.32	0.021
	Self-efficacyf	0.16	0.05	3.25	0.001**
Fast food restaurants-related variables
Behavior	Eating at fast food restaurantsc	−0.28	0.10	−2.81	0.005
Mediating variables	Intention to changed	0.25	0.09	2.85	0.005
	Outcome expectatione	0.11	0.04	2.46	0.014
	Self-efficacyf	0.15	0.05	2.78	0.006
Overall eating-related mediating variables
Perceived barrierse		0.09	0.05	1.72	0.087
Autonomous motivation on eatingf		0.17	0.05	3.82	<0.001***
Competence on eatingf		0.18	0.05	3.63	<0.001***
Autonomy on eatingf		0.17	0.05	3.69	<0.001***
Physical activity-related variables
Behavior	Physical activity behaviorc	0.42	0.13	3.37	0.001**
Mediating variables	Intention to walk mored	0.27	0.08	3.54	<0.001***
	Intention to increase overall physical activityd	0.23	0.07	3.19	0.002**
	Outcome expectatione	0.15	0.04	3.52	<0.001***
	Perceived barriers on physical activitye	0.05	0.06	0.73	0.465
	Self-efficacy on walkingf	0.11	0.5	2.35	0.020
	Autonomous motivation on physical activityf	0.08	0.04	1.88	0.061
	Competence on physical activityf	0.06	0.05	1.19	0.237
	Autonomy on physical activityf	0.11	0.05	2.39	0.017

^aDependent variables are post-test scores; ^b‘Student Satisfaction’ was included as a predictor, and gender and pre-test scores were included as covariates in the model. ^cScale: 1–9 point system: 1 = lowest consumption to 9 = highest consumption. ^dIntention to change response options are based on stage of changes: 1 = won’t do it within next 6 months, 2 = will try within the next 6 months, 3 = plan to do it in a month or so, 3 = currently doing it for past 1–6 months, 4 = have been doing it for over past 6 months. ^eResponse options: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = uncertain, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree. ^fResponse options: 1 = not sure, 2 = a little sure, 3 = somewhat sure, 4 = very sure.

Bold text indicates P < 0.05. Adjustment for multiple comparisons were manually done with Bonferroni method (adjusted significance level α = 0.002). **P ≤ 0.002; ***P < 0.001.