Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 18;9:75. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00075

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Percent time on open arms in the Elevated Plus Maze (EPM): ko vs. wt: Two Sample t-test, t = 0.17, p = 0.86 (n.s.), Nko = 14, Nwt = 20. (B) Left: Path length traveled in the Open Field Test: ko vs. wt: Two Sample t-test, t = 0.15, p = 0.88 (n.s.), Nko = 14, Nwt = 21. Right: Number of stops while exploring the Open Field arena: ko vs. wt: Two Sample t-test, t = 2.36, p = 0.025 (*), Nko = 14, Nwt = 21. (C) Mean time to find the correct hole on the Barnes maze. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of trial, indicating that both genotypes learned the position of the correct hole [F(1, 170) = 392.86, p < 2e-16]. There was no effect of genotype. In addition a comparison of the areas under the learning curves did not reveal any significant differences between ko vs. wt, AUC-Analysis: Two Sample t-test, t = 1.02, p = 0.32.