Table 3. Probit regression models for contraceptive use in urban and rural areas (ref: non-users).
Model 4 - | Urban | Model 4 - | Rural | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Level 1—Women | ||||
Wealth index | ||||
Linear | - | - | ||
Difference | 0.184 | ** | 0.188 | * |
Education (Ref: No formal education) | ||||
Primary | 0.338 | ** | 0.300 | *** |
Secondary or Higher | 0.745 | *** | 0.686 | *** |
Religion (ref: Catholic) | ||||
Evangelical/Pentecostal | -0.134 | 0.031 | ||
Zionist | -0.291 | ** | 0.057 | |
Islamic | -0.001 | -0.101 | ||
Other | -0.152 | -0.349 | ** | |
Age (ref: 20–24) | ||||
15–19 years | -0.016 | -0.214 | ||
25–29 years | -0.117 | -0.007 | ||
30–34 years | -0.271 | ** | -0.171 | |
35–39 years | -0.490 | *** | -0.122 | |
40–44 years | -0.824 | *** | -0.390 | ** |
45–49 years | -1.248 | *** | -0.529 | *** |
Marital status (ref: Married) | ||||
Other | -0.053 | -0.053 | ||
Currently residing with husband/partner (ref: yes) | ||||
No | -0.319 | *** | -0.106 | |
Other wives (ref: No) | ||||
Yes | 0.046 | 0.029 | ||
Female occupation (ref: Not working) | ||||
Working | 0.102 | 0.043 | ||
Distance to medical help (ref: no big problem) | ||||
A big problem | -0.018 | -0.029 | ||
Living children (reference: 1) | ||||
0 | -0.868 | *** | -0.916 | *** |
2 | 0.382 | *** | 0.139 | |
3 | 0.525 | *** | 0.149 | |
4+ | 0.832 | *** | 0.448 | *** |
Thresholds | 1.373 | *** | 1.772 | *** |
Level 2—Communities | ||||
Wealth index | ||||
Wealth Index (PSU) | 0.259 | *** | 0.475 | *** |
Residence (ref: Rural) | ||||
Urban | - | - | ||
Region (ref:Nampula) | ||||
Niassa | 0.061 | 0.564 | ** | |
Cabo Delgado | -0.543 | * | -0.246 | |
Nampula | -0.434 | -0.165 | ||
Tete | -0.229 | 0.908 | *** | |
Manica | -0.077 | 0.268 | ||
Sofala | -0.368 | 0.357 | * | |
Inhambane | -0.107 | 0.371 | * | |
Gaza | 0.466 | * | 0.491 | ** |
Maputo | 0.330 | 0.535 | * | |
Var(u j ) | 0.001 | 0.102 | *** | |
ICC | 0.001 | 0.093 |
Notes: Residual variance is equal to 1;
*** (p < 0.001),
** (p < 0.01),
* (p < 0.05).