Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0119611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119611

Table 1. Priming effect by population and stimulus type.

Population Stimulus Class Relatedness Priming Effect:Mean % (SEM)
Native Phonological Related 5% (2.6)
Native Phonological Unrelated 2% (1)
Native Semantic Related 10% (3.5)
Native Semantic Unrelated 16% (2.5)
Non-native L1 Phonological Related 18% (.9)
Non-native L1 Phonological Unrelated 8% (.9)
Non-native L1 Semantic Related 0% (2)
Non-native L1 Semantic Unrelated 6% (2.5)
Hearing L2 Phonological Related 8% (.4)
Hearing L2 Phonological Unrelated 12% (.9)
Hearing L2 Semantic Related 6% (.7)
Hearing L2 Semantic Unrelated 8% (.4)