Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 18;53(4):1277–1281. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03558-14

TABLE 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV with 95% CIs for diagnoses of CIN2+ and CIN3 for hrHPV detection by cobas HPV and AHPV testsa

Value type by CIN grade AHPV
Cobas
P
Value (%) 95% CI (%) Value (%) 95% CI (%)
CIN2+b
    Sensitivity 89.4 81.3–94.8 89.4 81.3–94.8 1
    Specificity 63.1 59.8–66.3 59.3 56.0–62.5 0.0003
    PPV 20.3 16.5–24.5 18.8 15.2–22.7 0.01
    NPV 98.30 96.80–99.20 98.10 96.60–99.10 0.8
CIN3+b
    Sensitivity 95.2 83.8–99.4 92.9 80.5–98.5 1
    Specificity 60.5 57.3–63.6 56.8 53.5–59.9 0.0002
    PPV 9.7 7.0–12.9 8.7 6.3–11.7 0.03
    NPV 99.70 98.70–100 99.40 98.40–99.90 0.5
a

PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CIN2+, cervical intraepithelial grade 2 or more; CIN3, cervical intraepithelial grade 3; hrHPV, high-risk human papillomavirus; AHPV, Aptima HPV. Differences in sensitivity and specificity were tested for statistical significance using an exact version of the McNemar chi-square test.

b

Includes one case of adenocarcinoma in situ.