Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 18;53(4):1277–1281. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03558-14

TABLE 4.

Comparison of hrHPV and HPV genotype detection results, ranked hierarchically according to cancer risk, by cobas HPV and AHPV testsa

AHPV result by type and oncogenic risk cobas result by HPV type
Total
HPV16 positive HPV18 positive Other 12 hrHPV positive hrHPV negative
HPV16 positive
    No. 89 1 2 0 92
    % of total 9.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 9.3
    No. CIN2+ 36 0 1 0 37
    % CIN2+ 38.3 0.0 1.1 0.0 39.4
HPV18/45 positive
    No. 1 32 18 1 52
    % of total 0.1 3.2 1.8 0.1 5.3
    No. CIN2+ 1 8 2 1 12
    % CIN2+ 1.1 8.5 2.1 1.1 12.8
Other 11 hrHPV positive
    No. 12 3 228 27 270
    % of total 1.2 0.3 23.1 2.7 27.3
    No. CIN2+ 3 0 30 2 35
    % CIN2+ 3.2 0.0 31.9 2.1 37.2
hrHPV negative
    No. 11 7 44 512 574
    % of total 1.1 0.7 4.5 51.8 58.1
    No. CIN2+ 0 1 2 7 10
    % CIN2+ 0.0 1.1 2.1 7.4 10.6
Total
    No. 113 43 292 540 988
    % of total 11.4 4.4 29.6 54.7 100.0
    No. CIN2+ 40 9 35 10 94
    % CIN2+ 42.6 9.6 37.2 10.6 100.0
a

cobas separately detects HPV16 and HPV18 individually and concurrently with detection of a pool of 12 other hrHPV genotypes. AHPV GT separately detects HPV16 individually and HPV18 and HPV45 (HPV18/45) as a pool sequentially following positive testing for pool of 14 hrHPV genotypes. Presented is the number positive and percent of total samples tested positive of each paired result, and the number and the percentage of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe diagnoses (CIN2+).