Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2015 Mar 18;53(4):1317–1323. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03570-14

Impact of Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Pregnancy with Azithromycin-Containing Regimens on Maternal Nasopharyngeal Carriage and Antibiotic Sensitivity of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus: a Cross-Sectional Survey at Delivery

Holger W Unger a,b, Celestine Aho b, Maria Ome-Kaius b, Regina A Wangnapi b, Alexandra J Umbers a,b, Wanda Jack b, Alice Lafana b, Audrey Michael b,, Sarah Hanieh a, Peter Siba b, Ivo Mueller c,d,e, Andrew R Greenhill b,f, Stephen J Rogerson a,
Editor: N A Ledeboer
PMCID: PMC4365252  PMID: 25673788

Abstract

Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) plus azithromycin (AZ) (SPAZ) has the potential for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp), but its use could increase circulation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria associated with severe pediatric infections. We evaluated the effect of monthly SPAZ-IPTp compared to a single course of SP plus chloroquine (SPCQ) on maternal nasopharyngeal carriage and antibiotic susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus at delivery among 854 women participating in a randomized controlled trial in Papua New Guinea. Serotyping was performed, and antibiotic susceptibility was evaluated by disk diffusion and Etest. Potential risk factors for carriage were examined. Nasopharyngeal carriage at delivery of S. pneumoniae (SPAZ, 7.2% [30/418], versus SPCQ, 19.3% [84/436]; P < 0.001) and H. influenzae (2.9% [12/418] versus 6.0% [26/436], P = 0.028), but not S. aureus, was significantly reduced among women who had received SPAZ-IPTp. The number of macrolide-resistant pneumococcal isolates was small but increased in the SPAZ group (13.3% [4/30], versus SPCQ, 2.2% [2/91]; P = 0.033). The proportions of isolates with serotypes covered by the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine were similar (SPAZ, 10.3% [3/29], versus SPCQ, 17.6% [16/91]; P = 0.352). Although macrolide-resistant isolates were rare, they were more commonly detected in women who had received SPAZ-IPTp, despite the significant reduction of maternal carriage of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae observed in this group. Future studies on SPAZ-IPTp should evaluate carriage and persistence of macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae and other pathogenic bacteria in both mothers and infants and assess the clinical significance of their circulation.

INTRODUCTION

Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) can prevent low birth weight (LBW; <2,500 g) and reduces infant morbidity and mortality in resource-limited countries (1, 2). However, high-level resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to SP, recently observed in East Africa, may render IPTp-SP clinically inefficacious (35). The development and evaluation of new IPTp regimens are therefore of utmost importance (6, 7).

Azithromycin (AZ) is a broad-spectrum macrolide (azalide) antibiotic with favorable antimalarial properties and a good safety profile in pregnancy (8, 9). IPTp with SPAZ prevented LBW and preterm delivery in two clinical trials (10, 11), and confounding may in part explain the observation of no effect in the third (6, 12); this warrants its further evaluation as a potential alternative to SP-IPTp.

An integral part of such evaluation is to screen for adverse consequences, including the selection of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (13), a principal cause of meningitis and respiratory infections in infants (14). Mass administration (MDA) of AZ to children has been associated with increased nasopharyngeal carriage of macrolide-resistant pneumococci, particularly when MDA was given at 6- to 12-monthly intervals (1520). However, this is not a unanimous finding (21) and may in part depend on the prevalence of resistant isolates at baseline (1518). Longitudinal studies of carriage and resistance patterns indicate that in the event of MDA-driven temporary expansion of macrolide-resistant isolates, a decrease in their prevalence tends to occur 12 to 24 months after the most recent treatment (19, 20).

In addition to macrolide resistance, MDA has also been associated with selection of β-lactam-resistant pneumococci (22) and causes serotype replacement, which is probably temporary (15); the consequences for clinical response in severe pediatric infections remain to be elucidated (20). Furthermore, it is unclear whether MDA preferentially selects for nonvaccine serotypes, whose role in severe infection requires further investigation (15). Such potential drawbacks will need to be carefully weighed against potential benefits of MDA, or SPAZ-IPTp, which include reductions in child and adult morbidity and mortality (23). Also of interest is the impact of AZ administration on carriage and resistance patterns in other important pathogenic bacteria, e.g., Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae. Frequent or long-term administration of AZ can alter the carriage of these two organisms (24), and S. aureus commonly displays antimicrobial resistance.

As such, we studied the impact of IPTp with SPAZ on maternal nasopharyngeal carriage and antibiotic susceptibility of S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and S. aureus at delivery in Papua New Guinea (PNG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Setting.

Between 2009 and 2012, pregnant women in antenatal clinics in Madang Province, PNG, were recruited to a randomized controlled trial (“IPTp trial”) investigating the safety and efficacy of IPTp with AZ (2 tablets [500 mg] twice daily for 2 days; Pfizer, USA) and SP (3 tablets [500/25 mg]; Micro Labs Ltd., India) given up to three times to prevent LBW (clinical trial registration no. NCT01136850) (11). The control arm consisted of SP (3 tablets, 500/25 mg) plus chloroquine (CQ) (3 or 4 150-mg tablets, daily for 3 days; Medopharm, India) given at first antenatal visit, followed by two courses of placebo (J. Bonal S.A., Spain). The first dose of each course was taken under direct supervision by clinical staff, with the remainder to be taken at home. Patient-reported adherence to subsequent doses of each course was high (∼98%) (11).

In PNG, macrolide use is confined to management of preterm premature rupture of membranes and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (25), which are common (26). H. influenzae type b (Hib) vaccination, but not pneumococcal vaccine, has been routinely offered since 2008 (27).

Maternal pneumococcal carriage data for PNG are lacking. Carriage is common in infants in the PNG highlands (28, 29). Pneumococcal isolates from children presenting with bacterial meningitis to the Madang Provincial Hospital (2006 to 2010) were sensitive to erythromycin (E) and ceftriaxone, yet some exhibited reduced or no susceptibility to penicillin, chloramphenicol (CHL), co-trimoxazole (COT), and tetracycline (TET) (L. Manning, personal communication) (30). Drug resistance was very common among invasive H. influenzae isolates, prompting a change in PNG national treatment policy (31). The same study identified nonvaccine isolates of S. pneumoniae as a cause of severe pediatric illness: two invasive pneumococcal isolates were nonserotypeable (NST), and nine and six were not covered by the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-13) and the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV-23), respectively (L. Manning, personal communication). Previous and ongoing surveillance of pediatric meningitis cases in the highlands of PNG reveals the important role of non-PCV-13 strains in disease: approximately one-third of culture-confirmed cases of pneumococcal meningitis were caused by nonvaccine types 2, 24, and 46 (A. R. Greenhill, S. Phuanukoonnon, A. Michael, M. Yoannes, T. Orami, H. Smith, D. Murphy, C. Blyth, J. Reeder, P. Siba, W. Pomat, and D. Lehmann, submitted for publication). S. pneumoniae and Hib were the most important bacteria causing meningitis. While resistance to penicillin was common in S. pneumoniae (21.5% of isolates), none of the isolates tested was resistant to erythromycin (Greenhill et al., submitted). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was observed among septic surgical patients at the referral hospital in the study area (32).

Study population.

All pregnant women participating in the IPTp trial were eligible for inclusion at baseline in the present study (11). Eligibility criteria for the original trial are described in detail elsewhere (11). Women were randomized to treatment, and demographic and clinical information, including additional antibiotic use, were collected at enrollment, monthly treatment visits (n = 2), morbidity visits, and delivery. The protocol was approved by the PNG Institute of Medical Research Institutional Review Board, the PNG Medical Research Advisory Council, and the Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee. All women provided written informed consent for inclusion in the original trial and the bacteriology study.

Sample collection.

In this cross-sectional survey, samples were collected at delivery from trial participants from January 2010 to April 2011 (phase 1) and from February to October 2012 (phase 2) (Table 1). Sampling periods were dictated by staff availability, and swab collection was opportunistic and undertaken only when collection of main trial data and samples permitted. A sterile swab (Medical Wire & Equipment, Corsham, United Kingdom) was inserted into the posterior nasopharynx, in accordance with standard methodology (33). Swab tips were clipped into cryovials containing 1 ml of skim milk-tryptone-glucose-glycerin medium (STGG), stored at −20°C, and transported frozen to the bacteriology laboratory (Goroka, PNG), where they were stored at −70°C until processed (34).

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of study participants, by treatment groups

Characteristic No. (%)
P
SPCQ (n = 436) SPAZ (n = 418)
Age, yr
    <20 67 (15.4) 90 (21.5) 0.061
    ≥20 and <30 285 (65.4) 258 (61.7)
    ≥30 84 (19.3) 70 (16.8)
Fundal ht at enrollment (cm)
    <20 94 (21.6) 110 (26.3) 0.103
    ≥20 and <27 342 (78.4) 308 (73.7)
Undernourisheda 129 (29.6) 111 (26.6) 0.324
Primigravida 200 (45.9) 224 (53.6) 0.024
Residing in periurban settlement 91 (20.9) 87 (20.8) 0.983
Smoker 84 (19.3) 93 (22.3) 0.282
User of areca nut 355 (81.4) 338 (81.3) 0.834
Literate 391 (90.6) 378 (90.4) 0.934
Sampling period
    Phase 1 (dates) 302 (69.3) 279 (66.8)
    Phase 2 (dates) 134 (30.7) 139 (33.3) 0.430
Recent antibiotic use (<30 days)b 53 (12.2) 53 (12.7) 0.817
Antibiotic use (any) during pregnancyb 105 (24.1) 99 (23.7) 0.891
a

Defined as a mid-upper-arm circumference of <23 cm at first antenatal visit.

b

Excluding trial drugs, ≥1 course during time period and until and including at the time of sampling.

Laboratory investigations.

All laboratory staff were blinded to treatment. For isolation of S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and S. aureus, specimens were inoculated onto horse blood agar (HBA), chocolate agar (CA), gentamicin blood agar (GBA) (5% horse blood and 5 μl/ml gentamicin), and bacitracin chocolate agar (BCA) (Oxoid, Thermofisher, Australia) and incubated for 24 to 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2.

Colonies of S. pneumoniae were distinguished from other alpha-hemolytic streptococci using optochin disk inhibition (Oxoid, Thermofisher, Australia), complemented by a positive bile solubility test (10% sodium desoxycholate). For each carrier, two colonies were serotyped by Quellung reaction with pooled and individual serotype-specific pneumococcal antisera (SSI Diagnostics, Copenhagen, Denmark).

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed for one of two serotyped isolates per carrier if both were of the same serotype/serogroup and for both if they differed. Sensitivities of pneumococcal isolates to AZ, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol (CHL), co-trimoxazole (COT), erythromycin (E), oxacillin (OX), and tetracycline (TET) were assessed by disk diffusion (Oxoid, Thermofisher, Australia) (35). MICs for S. pneumoniae isolates with intermediate or full resistance by disk diffusion were evaluated on Mueller-Hinton medium with 5% lysed horse blood using Etest strips (AZ, CHL, COT, penicillin, and TET) (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). For AZ, equivalent MIC breakpoints of ≤0.5 μg/ml and ≥2 μg/ml were defined as sensitive and resistant, respectively (35).

Growth on CA and/or BCA, but not HBA, was used to identify colonies with morphological characteristics consistent with H. influenzae. Strains were confirmed through growth only in the presence of both X and V factors (Oxoid, Thermofisher, Australia). A chromogenic cephalosporin disk was used to test isolates for β-lactamase production (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Serotyping for H. influenzae was not performed. S. aureus was identified through DNase and direct tube coagulase testing. Confirmed S. aureus isolates were tested for antibiotic susceptibility (ampicillin, AZ, COT, CHL, E, gentamicin, OX, and TET) by disk diffusion (Oxoid, Thermofisher, Australia) (35).

Statistical analysis.

Maternal nasopharyngeal pneumococcal colonization was estimated at 20% (36, 37). To show a 40% reduction in S. pneumoniae carriage in women who received SPAZ (significance level, 0.05; power of 90%), a minimum of 383 specimens were required from each arm. Because opportunity sampling was applied, an additional 10% of the calculated total number of specimens were collected.

Primary outcome measures included (i) nasopharyngeal carriage, defined as the proportion of women with a positive culture; (ii) the proportion of serotypes/serogroups among the total of distinct isolates; and (iii) antibiotic susceptibility, characterized as the proportion of isolates showing intermediate or full resistance to a given antibiotic by disk diffusion.

Univariate comparisons of variables were performed using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical data, the Student t test for parametric data, and the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for categorical outcomes. P values at <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All factors with a tendency for association with, e.g., pneumococcal carriage when analyzed univariately (defined as a P value of <0.10) were included in a multivariable logistic regression model which then used a backward stepwise elimination model selection procedure.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics.

Of 2,793 women randomized to treatment in the original trial, 2,775 were eligible for inclusion at baseline. Among them, 50 participants were withdrawn before delivery, 37 did not receive study medications, and 454 were lost to follow-up, resulting in 2,234 women with pregnancy outcome follow-up. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and cultured for 857 participants, using opportunity sampling. Three study participants were subsequently excluded for treatment crossover, leaving 854 participants for inclusion in the present analysis. Of them, 418 (49.0%) received ≥1 treatment course of SPAZ (mean, 2.8; median, 3; range, 1 to 3). Women who had received SPAZ were more likely to be primigravid (SPAZ, 53.6%, versus SPCQ, 45.9%; P = 0.024). Other participant characteristics were similar between treatment groups (Table 1). The mean (± standard deviation) time difference between last study treatment visit and swab collection was 53 ± 30 days (median, 49 days).

Impact of IPTp with SPAZ on nasopharyngeal carriage of S. pneumoniae.

Overall, specimens from 114 women (13.4%) yielded 126 isolates of S. pneumoniae. Carriage rates were significantly lower in the intervention group (SPAZ, 7.2%, versus SPCQ, 19.3%; OR [95% CI], 0.32 [0.21 to 0.51]; P < 0.001) (Table 2). Factors associated with reduced carriage included late sample period, not residing in a periurban settlement, not chewing areca nut, and women pursuing an income-generating activity (Table 3). When adjusted for these factors, the relationship between SPAZ and reduced pneumococcal carriage remained significant (Table 2). Reduction in carriage in the intervention arm was noted in each sampling period (phase 1, SPAZ, 8.6% [24/279], versus SPCQ, 23.5% [71/302]; P < 0.001; phase 2, SPAZ, 4.3% [6/139], versus SPCQ, 9.7% [13/134]; P = 0.098). There were no statistically significant associations between carriage and the length of time since last study treatment, reported or documented use of other antibiotics in pregnancy, season (overall and by treatment arms), or other participant characteristics (Table 1). In the intervention arm, there was a tendency for less frequent pneumococcal carriage among women who had ≥2 study treatments compared to a single treatment (6.7% [27/404] versus 21.4% [3/14]; P = 0.071), but the number of women who received only one course of SPAZ was small.

TABLE 2.

Effect of IPTp with SPAZ on nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus at delivery

Species and treatment group (n) No. (%) of carriers Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Streptococcus pneumoniae
    SPCQ (436) 84 (19.3) 1.0 1.0
    SPAZ (418) 30 (7.2) 0.32 (0.21, 0.51) 0.32 (0.21, 0.51)a
Haemophilus influenzae
    SPCQ (436) 26 (6.0) 1.0 1.0
    SPAZ (418) 12 (2.9) 0.47 (0.21, 0.97) 0.46 (0.23, 0.93)b
Staphylococcus aureus
    SPCQ (436) 105 (24.1) 1.0 1.0
    SPAZ (418) 99 (23.7) 0.98 (0.71, 1.34) 0.99 (0.72, 1.36)c
a

Adjusted for period of sampling, area of residence, and areca nut consumption.

b

Adjusted for period of sampling and partner's income generation status.

c

Adjusted for period of sampling and women's income generation status.

TABLE 3.

Factors associated with nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus in Madang Province, Papua New Guinea, by crude analysis

Species and characteristic Total n (%) OR (95% CI) P
Streptococcus pneumoniae
    Sampling period
        Phase 1 581 95 (16.4) 1.00
        Phase 2 273 19 (7.0) 0.38 (0.23, 0.64) <0.001
    Lives in periurban settlement
        No 671 80 (11.9) 1.00
        Yes 178 33 (18.5) 1.68 (1.08, 2.63) 0.021
    Consumes areca nut
        No 161 11 (6.8) 1.00
        Yes 693 103 (14.9) 2.38 (1.24, 4.56) 0.007
    Woman generates income
        No 433 71 (16.4) 1.00
        Yes 421 43 (10.2) 0.58 (0.39, 0.87) 0.008
Haemophilus influenzae
    Sampling period
        Phase 1 581 36 (6.2) 1.00
        Phase 2 273 0.7 (2) 0.11 (0.02, 0.47) <0.001
    Partner generates income
        No 280 21 (7.5) 1.00
        Yes 574 17 (3.0) 0.38 (0.20, 0.73) 0.003
Staphylococcus aureus
    Sampling period
        Phase 1 581 162 (27.9) 1.00
        Phase 2 273 42 (15.4) 0.47 (0.32, 0.69) <0.001
    Woman generates income
        No 433 121 (27.9) 1.00
        Yes 421 83 (19.7) (0.46, 0.87) 0.005

Frequency and distribution of serotypes by treatment arms.

Of 114 women with pneumococcal carriage, serotype data were available for 108; 120 distinct isolates were detected (91 and 29 isolates in SPCQ and SPAZ groups, respectively) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Twelve women (10 for SPCQ, 2 for SPAZ) carried two serotypes. Fifty-six isolates were nonserotypeable (NST), accounting for a large proportion of isolates in both groups (SPAZ, 41.4% [12/29], versus SPCQ, 48.4% [44/91]; P = 0.512). Proportions of isolates with serotypes/serogroups covered by the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-13) or the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV-23) were low and did not differ significantly between treatment groups (PCV-13: SPAZ, 10.3% [3/29], versus SPCQ, 17.6% [16/91], P = 0.559; PPV-23: SPAZ, 24.1% [7/29], versus SPCQ, 20.9% [19/91], P = 0.711). The most common serotypeable pneumococci were of serotypes 6A and 10; their proportion did not differ significantly by treatment arm (serotype 6A: SPAZ, 3.5% [1/29], versus 9.9% [9/91], P = 0.448; serotype 10: SPAZ, 6.9% [2/29], versus 5.5% [5/91], P = 0.675) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).

Pneumococcal antibiotic susceptibility following IPTp with SPAZ.

In the SPCQ and SPAZ groups, 2 of 91 and 4 of 30 pneumococcal isolates, respectively, that underwent antibiotic sensitivity testing exhibited resistance to macrolides (P = 0.033) (Table 4). None of the women with macrolide-resistant isolates had documentation of additional macrolide use in the index pregnancy. Macrolide-resistant isolates were the only isolates exhibiting reduced susceptibility to ≥3 different antibiotic classes on disk diffusion; all remained sensitive to chloramphenicol (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).

TABLE 4.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing of maternal nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected at delivery following a single course of SP and chloroquine or IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and azithromycin (AZ)f

Antibiotic SPCQ (n = 91)
SPAZ (n = 30)
Pe
No. of isolates (% of total tested)
Median MIC, μg/ml (IQR) No. of isolates (% of total tested)
Median MIC, μg/ml (IQR)
S I R S I R
Azithromycin 89 (97.8) 0 2 (2.2) 12b 26 (86.7) 0 4 (6.7) 70 (7.5, 192) 0.033
Ceftriaxone 88 (96.7) 2 (2.2)d 1 (1.1)d 30 (100.0) 0 0 0.422
Chloramphenicol 90 (98.9) 1 (1.1) 0 2 30 (100.0) 0 0 0.752
Co-trimoxazole 52 (57.1) 5 (5.4) 34 (37.4) 6 (1.25, 12)b 18 (60.0) 0 12 (40.0) 4 (2.5–7) 0.783
Penicillina 35 (38.5) 11 (12.1) 45 (49.5) 0.25 (0.125, 0.5)b 14 (46.7) 3 (10.0) 13 (43.3) 0.25 (0.125, 0.38) 0.427
Tetracycline 84 (92.3) 1 (1.1) 6 (6.6) 24 (8.125, 40)c 26 (86.7) 3 (10.0) 1 (3.3) 32 (24, 32) 0.427
MDR(2) 54 (59.3) 40 (44.0) 18 (60.0) 12 (40.0) 0.949
MDR(3) 89 (97.8) 2 (2.2) 26 (86.7) 4 (13.3) 0.033
a

Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion with oxacillin, Etest with penicillin.

b

Missing MIC data for one isolate.

c

Missing MIC data for 2 isolates.

d

All isolates showed reduced sensitivity to oxacillin by disk diffusion; one isolate had a penicillin MIC of 0.047 μg/ml.

e

P values of <0.05 are marked in bold.

f

Abbreviations: S, sensitive; I, intermediate; R, resistant; IQR, interquartile range; MDR(2), multidrug resistant—reduced sensitivity to ≥2 antibiotic classes tested by disk diffusion; MDR(3), multidrug resistant—reduced sensitivity to ≥3 antibiotic classes tested by disk diffusion.

The proportion of β-lactam- and co-trimoxazole-resistant pneumococcal isolates was high and did not differ by treatment arm (β-lactam: SPAZ, 53.3% [16/30], versus SPCQ, 61.5% [56/91], P = 0.427; co-trimoxazole: SPAZ, 40.0% [12/30], versus SPCQ, 42.9% [39/91], P = 0.783) (Table 4).

Impact of SPAZ on nasopharyngeal carriage and antibiotic susceptibility of H. influenzae and S. aureus.

Nasopharyngeal carriage of H. influenzae was less frequent among women who had received SPAZ (2.9% [12/418], versus SPCQ, 6.0% [26/436]; P = 0.028) (Table 2), but carriage of S. aureus was similar (P = 0.892; Table 2). The proportion of AZ-resistant S. aureus isolates was significantly larger in the SPAZ group (79.6% [78/98], versus SPCQ, 14.4% [15/104]; P < 0.001), as was the number of isolates resistant to chloramphenicol (SPAZ, 11.2% [11/98], versus SPCQ, 2.9% [3/104]; P = 0.019) and resistant to ≥2 antibiotic classes (SPAZ, 19.4% [18/98], versus SPCQ, 3.8% [4/104]; P < 0.001) (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). Four of 98 and two of 104 isolates exhibited reduced sensitivity to both macrolides and oxacillin in SPCQ and SPAZ groups, respectively. Resistance to gentamicin, co-trimoxazole, and tetracycline was absent or rare (see Table S3 in the supplemental material).

DISCUSSION

IPTp with SPAZ significantly reduced maternal nasopharyngeal carriage of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae at delivery. Macrolide-resistant pneumococci were uncommon overall but occurred more frequently among women who had received SPAZ. Many pneumococcal isolates were resistant to β-lactams and co-trimoxazole, and most were NST and of nonvaccine type. SPAZ had no effect on nasopharyngeal colonization with S. aureus but increased the proportion of macrolide- and chloramphenicol-resistant staphylococci.

Pneumococcal nasopharyngeal carriage rates in women who received SPCQ were similar to those in other low-resource environments (36, 37). Macrolide-resistant pneumococci were occasionally isolated from women in the SPCQ group: the use of AZ for syndromic management of bacterial STIs (25) and/or antibiotic cross-class resistance may explain their circulation in the study area. The increase in the proportion of macrolide-resistant pneumococci observed in the SPAZ group may be primarily due to selection of such circulating drug-resistant isolates, rather than induction of drug resistance de novo (15, 18). Reassuringly, pneumococci recently isolated from local children with acute bacterial meningitis remained macrolide sensitive (L. Manning, personal communication) (30).

The marked reduction in pneumococcal carriage in the SPAZ group has not been observed in all MDA studies (20). SPAZ-IPTp is administered to a comparatively small fraction of the community, as opposed to MDA, which involves the simultaneous treatment with lower dose of AZ (20 mg/kg of body weight; maximum, 1,000 mg) of many individuals at a single time point. The lower dosage and widespread administration may lead to increasing community “baseline” resistance levels. MDA may need to be undertaken annually or more regularly. IPTp is given in monthly intervals from quickening until delivery but will then not be required until the subsequent pregnancy, ≥24 months in breastfeeding mothers (38). With an intermission of ∼2 years, macrolide-resistant isolates may have been eliminated as a result of the cost associated with drug resistance (39). By comparison, MDA repeated in short intervals may increase the risk of antimicrobial resistance (20), although evidence remains inconclusive (21).

The proportion of isolates of nonvaccine serotypes was high, and many were nonserotypeable: similar observations have been made in pregnant women in The Gambia and Thailand (36, 37). Both amoxicillin and co-trimoxazole are widely available in PNG, while SP was until recently a first-line antimalarial (40). Although penicillin resistance in S. pneumoniae may be short-lived (41), the high number of β-lactam- and co-trimoxazole-resistant pneumococci and the presence of ceftriaxone-resistant isolates in the control arm raise concerns. Elimination of unnecessary antibiotic use and careful monitoring of ceftriaxone resistance are required: ceftriaxone is a first-line treatment for acute bacterial meningitis in PNG (27). Pneumococcal carriage was higher among regular consumers of areca (betel) nuts, which in PNG are usually chewed together with the betel pepper fruit and lime. The latter is frequently shared between chewers; this, and mucosal inflammation secondary to chewing, may facilitate pneumococcal colonization. Chewing has already been associated with tuberculosis (42).

SPAZ reduced the proportion of women with nasopharyngeal carriage of H. influenzae but did not affect carriage of S. aureus. The significance of the increased proportion of macrolide- and chloramphenicol-resistant S. aureus isolates is unclear, but resistance monitoring for a range of bacteria will be required should IPTp with SPAZ be implemented. A small number of isolates were resistant to both oxacillin and macrolides: this points toward circulation of low levels of community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (32).

This is the first study to assess the impact of IPTp with SPAZ on nasopharyngeal bacterial carriage and antibiotic susceptibility. Our appropriate sample size, detection of three key bacterial species (with comprehensive antimicrobial susceptibility testing for two), pneumococcal serotyping, access to a large clinical and demographic data set, and availability of a nonmacrolide control group all contribute to a robust experimental design. Nonetheless, experimental limitations exist. Nasopharyngeal carriage was assessed at a single time point only (cross-sectional survey at delivery), and nasopharyngeal carriage characteristics before treatment or after, e.g., 6 to 12 months following treatment, are unknown; this has implications at several levels. Pneumococcal carriage and susceptibility patterns at delivery in the SPCQ group may mirror the general, pretreatment population of pregnant women; however, receipt of a single course of SPCQ could affect bacterial colonization and antibiotic sensitivities (40). Single-point sampling precluded the evaluation of both recolonization rates following treatment or after delivery and long-term effects of SPAZ on persistence of macrolide-resistant pneumococci and serotype replacement that were observed in MDA studies (15, 19, 20). Paired mother-infant nasopharyngeal specimens could have demonstrated the rates of mother-to-infant transfer of specific isolates from mother to infant; data from The Gambia suggest that the population-attributable fraction of infant carriage due to maternal carriage is low (9.5%) (36). Lastly, a freezer failure resulted in the loss of a small set of isolates for serotyping and/or antibiotic susceptibility testing. Additionally, we may not have detected/measured all potential confounders for our outcomes.

Future studies of IPTp with SPAZ, as well as its potential implementation, need to be coupled with antimicrobial surveillance as its administration carries the risk of selecting drug-resistant bacterial isolates.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the participating women and their families; the PNG Institute of Medical Research clinical, administrative, logistics, and laboratory staff; Lisa Lansfield; Paula Samol, Selina Silim, Joy Paniu, Pauline Peng, and Christalla Hajisava; and the staff at all participating health centers and hospitals.

This work was supported by the Malaria in Pregnancy Consortium, through a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (grant number 46099); the Pregvax Consortium, through a grant from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7-2007-HEALTH (grant number PREGVAX 201588); the Spanish Government (EUROSALUD 2008 Programme); and Pfizer Inc. (investigator-initiated research grant WS394663).

There are no reported conflicts of interest for any authors.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03570-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Umbers AJ, Aitken EH, Rogerson SJ. 2011. Malaria in pregnancy: small babies, big problem. Trends Parasitol 27:168–175. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2011.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kayentao K, Garner P, van Eijk AM, Naidoo I, Roper C, Mulokozi A, MacArthur JR, Luntamo M, Ashorn P, Doumbo OK, ter Kuile FO. 2013. Intermittent preventive therapy for malaria during pregnancy using 2 vs 3 or more doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and risk of low birth weight in Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 309:594–604. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.216231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Harrington WE, Mutabingwa TK, Muehlenbachs A, Sorensen B, Bolla MC, Fried M, Duffy PE. 2009. Competitive facilitation of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites in pregnant women who receive preventive treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:9027–9032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901415106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Taylor SM, Antonia AL, Chaluluka E, Mwapasa V, Feng G, Molyneux ME, ter Kuile FO, Meshnick SR, Rogerson SJ. 2012. Antenatal receipt of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine does not exacerbate pregnancy-associated malaria despite the expansion of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum: clinical outcomes from the QuEERPAM study. Clin Infect Dis 55:42–50. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Minja DT, Schmiegelow C, Mmbando B, Bostrom S, Oesterholt M, Magistrado P, Pehrson C, John D, Salanti A, Luty AJ, Lemnge M, Theander T, Lusingu J, Alifrangis M. 2013. Plasmodium falciparum mutant haplotype infection during pregnancy associated with reduced birthweight, Tanzania. Emerg Infect Dis 19:1446–1454. doi: 10.3201/eid1909.130133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chico RM, Chandramohan D. 2011. Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: at the crossroads of public health policy. Trop Med Int Health 16:774–785. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02765.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tagbor H, Bruce J, Agbo M, Greenwood B, Chandramohan D. 2010. Intermittent screening and treatment versus intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. PLoS One 5:e14425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shimizu S, Osada Y, Kanazawa T, Tanaka Y, Arai M. 2010. Suppressive effect of azithromycin on Plasmodium berghei mosquito stage development and apicoplast replication. Malar J 9:73. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Salman S, Rogerson SJ, Kose K, Griffin S, Gomorai S, Baiwog F, Winmai J, Kandai J, Karunajeewa HA, O'Halloran SJ, Siba P, Ilett KF, Mueller I, Davis TM. 2010. Pharmacokinetic properties of azithromycin in pregnancy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:360–366. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00771-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Luntamo M, Kulmala T, Mbewe B, Cheung YB, Maleta K, Ashorn P. 2010. Effect of repeated treatment of pregnant women with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and azithromycin on preterm delivery in Malawi: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Trop Med Hyg 83:1212–1220. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Unger HW, Ome-Kaius M, Wangnapi R, Umbers AJ, Hanieh S, Suen CS, Robinson L, Rosanas-Urgell A, Lufele E, Kongs C, Samol P, Sui D, Singirok D, Bardaji A, Schofield L, Menendez C, Betuela I, Siba P, Mueller D, Rogerson SJ. 2015. Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine plus azithromycin for the prevention of low birthweight in Papua New Guinea: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med 13:9. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0258-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.van den Broek NR, White SA, Goodall M, Ntonya C, Kayira E, Kafulafula G, Neilson JP. 2009. The APPLe study: a randomized, community-based, placebo-controlled trial of azithromycin for the prevention of preterm birth, with meta-analysis. PLoS Med 6:e1000191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chico RM, Pittrof R, Greenwood B, Chandramohan D. 2008. Azithromycin-chloroquine and the intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy. Malar J 7:255. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Obaro S, Adegbola R. 2002. The pneumococcus: carriage, disease and conjugate vaccines. J Med Microbiol 51:98–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leach AJ, Shelby-James TM, Mayo M, Gratten M, Laming AC, Currie BJ, Mathews JD. 1997. A prospective study of the impact of community-based azithromycin treatment of trachoma on carriage and resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin Infect Dis 24:356–362. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.3.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fry AM, Jha HC, Lietman TM, Chaudhary JS, Bhatta RC, Elliott J, Hyde T, Schuchat A, Gaynor B, Dowell SF. 2002. Adverse and beneficial secondary effects of mass treatment with azithromycin to eliminate blindness due to trachoma in Nepal. Clin Infect Dis 35:395–402. doi: 10.1086/341414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gaynor BD, Holbrook KA, Whitcher JP, Holm SO, Jha HC, Chaudhary JS, Bhatta RC, Lietman T. 2003. Community treatment with azithromycin for trachoma is not associated with antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae at 1 year. Br J Ophthalmol 87:147–148. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.2.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Batt SL, Charalambous BM, Solomon AW, Knirsch C, Massae PA, Safari S, Sam NE, Everett D, Mabey DC, Gillespie SH. 2003. Impact of azithromycin administration for trachoma control on the carriage of antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:2765–2769. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.9.2765-2769.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Haug S, Lakew T, Habtemariam G, Alemayehu W, Cevallos V, Zhou Z, House J, Ray K, Porco T, Rutar T, Keenan J, Lietman TM, Gaynor BD. 2010. The decline of pneumococcal resistance after cessation of mass antibiotic distributions for trachoma. Clin Infect Dis 51:571–574. doi: 10.1086/655697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Coles CL, Mabula K, Seidman JC, Levens J, Mkocha H, Munoz B, Mfinanga SG, West S. 2013. Mass distribution of azithromycin for trachoma control is associated with increased risk of azithromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage in young children 6 months after treatment. Clin Infect Dis 56:1519–1526. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Burr SE, Milne S, Jafali J, Bojang E, Rajasekhar M, Hart J, Harding-Esch EM, Holland MJ, Mabey DC, Sillah A, Bailey RL, Roca A. 2014. Mass administration of azithromycin and Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage: cross-sectional surveys in the Gambia. Bull World Health Organ 92:490–498. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.133462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Malhotra-Kumar S, Lammens C, Coenen S, Van Herck K, Goossens H. 2007. Effect of azithromycin and clarithromycin therapy on pharyngeal carriage of macrolide-resistant streptococci in healthy volunteers: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet 369:482–490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60235-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Keenan JD, Emerson PM, Gaynor BD, Porco TC, Lietman TM. 2013. Adult mortality in a randomized trial of mass azithromycin for trachoma. JAMA Intern Med 173:821–823. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hare KM, Singleton RJ, Grimwood K, Valery PC, Cheng AC, Morris PS, Leach AJ, Smith-Vaughan HC, Chatfield M, Redding G, Reasonover AL, McCallum GB, Chikoyak L, McDonald MI, Brown N, Torzillo PJ, Chang AB. 2013. Longitudinal nasopharyngeal carriage and antibiotic resistance of respiratory bacteria in indigenous Australian and Alaska native children with bronchiectasis. PLoS One 8:e70478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.National Department of Health. 2006. Standard management of sexually transmitted infections and genital conditions in Papua New Guinea—a manual for health workers in PNG. National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wangnapi RA, Soso S, Unger HW, Sawera C, Ome M, Umbers AJ, Ndrewei N, Siba P, Li Wai Suen CS, Vallely A, Wapling J, Ryan C, Mueller I, Rogerson SJ. 2014. Prevalence and risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis infection in pregnant women in Papua New Guinea. Sex Transm Infect doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.National Department of Health. 2011. Standard treatment for common illnesses of children in Papua New Guinea, 9th ed National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.van den Biggelaar AH, Pomat WS, Phuanukoonnon S, Michael A, Aho C, Nadal-Sims MA, Devitt CJ, Jacoby PA, Hales BJ, Smith WA, Mitchell T, Wiertsema S, Richmond P, Siba P, Holt PG, Lehmann D. 2012. Effect of early carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae on the development of pneumococcal protein-specific cellular immune responses in infancy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 31:243–248. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318245a5a8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Francis JP, Richmond PC, Pomat WS, Michael A, Keno H, Phuanukoonnon S, Nelson JB, Whinnen M, Heinrich T, Smith WA, Prescott SL, Holt PG, Siba PM, Lehmann D, van den Biggelaar AH. 2009. Maternal antibodies to pneumolysin but not to pneumococcal surface protein A delay early pneumococcal carriage in high-risk Papua New Guinean infants. Clin Vaccine Immunol 16:1633–1638. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00247-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Manning L, Laman M, Greenhill AR, Michael A, Siba P, Mueller I, Davis TM. 2011. Increasing chloramphenicol resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from Papua New Guinean children with acute bacterial meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4454–4456. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00526-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Laman M, Manning L. 2011. Acute bacterial meningitis in Papua New Guinea: new treatment guidelines in response to increasing antibiotic resistance. P N G Med J 54:1–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Asa H, Laman M, Greenhill AR, Siba PM, Davis TM, Maihua J, Manning L. 2012. Bloodstream infections caused by resistant bacteria in surgical patients admitted to Modilon Hospital, Madang. P N G Med J 55:5–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Satzke C, Turner P, Virolainen-Julkunen A, Adrian PV, Antonio M, Hare KM, Henao-Restrepo AM, Leach AJ, Klugman KP, Porter BD, Sa-Leao R, Scott JA, Nohynek H, O'Brien KL. 2013. Standard method for detecting upper respiratory carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae: updated recommendations from the World Health Organization Pneumococcal Carriage Working Group. Vaccine 32:165–179. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.O'Brien KL, Bronsdon MA, Dagan R, Yagupsky P, Janco J, Elliott J, Whitney CG, Yang YH, Robinson LG, Schwartz B, Carlone GM. 2001. Evaluation of a medium (STGG) for transport and optimal recovery of Streptococcus pneumoniae from nasopharyngeal secretions collected during field studies. J Clin Microbiol 39:1021–1024. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.1021-1024.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.CLSI. 2009. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 19th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S19. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Darboe MK, Fulford AJ, Secka O, Prentice AM. 2010. The dynamics of nasopharyngeal streptococcus pneumoniae carriage among rural Gambian mother-infant pairs. BMC Infect Dis 10:195. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Turner P, Turner C, Jankhot A, Helen N, Lee SJ, Day NP, White NJ, Nosten F, Goldblatt D. 2012. A longitudinal study of Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage in a cohort of infants and their mothers on the Thailand-Myanmar border. PLoS One 7:e38271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gray SJ. 1994. Comparison of effects of breast-feeding practices on birth-spacing in three societies: nomadic Turkana, Gainj, and Quechua. J Biosoc Sci 26:69–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Maher MC, Alemayehu W, Lakew T, Gaynor BD, Haug S, Cevallos V, Keenan JD, Lietman TM, Porco TC. 2012. The fitness cost of antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: insight from the field. PLoS One 7:e29407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Feikin DR, Dowell SF, Nwanyanwu OC, Klugman KP, Kazembe PN, Barat LM, Graf C, Bloland PB, Ziba C, Huebner RE, Schwartz B. 2000. Increased carriage of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Malawian children after treatment for malaria with sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine. J Infect Dis 181:1501–1505. doi: 10.1086/315382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Malhotra-Kumar S, Goossens H. 2013. Mass azithromycin distribution and emerging resistance: taking a minimum harms approach. Clin Infect Dis 56:1527–1529. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Singh PN, Natto Z, Yel D, Job J, Knutsen S. 2012. Betel quid use in relation to infectious disease outcomes in Cambodia. Int J Infect Dis 16:e262–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES