Table 2.
Effect | Macro-nutrients | Micro-nutrients | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | S | P | K | Ca | Mg | Fe | B | Mn | Zn | |||||||||||
F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | |
Year | 18.1 | ** | 87.7 | *** | 11.6 | *** | 6.2 | * | 51.1 | *** | 102.3 | *** | 1.9 | NS | 85.0 | *** | 1.6 | NS | 25.0 | *** |
Line | 15.5 | *** | 32.5 | *** | 43.5 | NS | 32.3 | NS | 12.7 | *** | 53.2 | *** | 55.1 | *** | 21.3 | *** | 4.1 | *** | 10.8 | *** |
Year × Line | 2.6 | ** | 3.7 | *** | 1.7 | NS | 1.9 | * | 0.6 | NS | 5.4 | *** | 3.9 | *** | 4.4 | *** | 2.4 | ** | 4.1 | *** |
Cotton was grown in the field in 2012 and 2013 in Stoneville, MS, USA.
Significance at P ≤ 0.05;
significance at P ≤ 0.01; significance at
P ≤ 0.001.