Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 19;10(3):e0119409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119409

Table 3. Difference in volumes between the extended (210 s) and standard (48 s) acquisition time (extended-standard).

Absolute median paired difference Relative median paired difference
ischemic core (IQR) [ml] ischemic penumbra (IQR) [ml] total perfusion abnormality (IQR) [ml] ischemic core (IQR) [%] ischemic penumbra (IQR) [%] total perfusion abnormality (IQR) [%]
All patients (n = 36) -13.2 (-26.0 –-4.3) 12.4 (4.1–25.7) 0.24 (-1.6–2.7) -84.3 (-136 –-31.8) 32.8 (14.1–69.6) -.7 (-4.0–4.0)
Patients without truncation (n = 5) -2.0 (-5.6–0.7) 3.6 (1.3–13.4) -2.7 (-0.2–8.8) -28.2 (-92.3–9.5) 9.5 (2.3–39.1) 3.7 (-52.0–21.3)
Patients with only tissue TAC truncation (n = 24) -14.4 (-20.9 –-6.1) 13.9 (6.0–19.7) -0.5 (-1.6–1.8) -84.3 (-139 –-43.1) 28.4 (14.1–52.3) -1.2 (-3.9–1.2)
Patients with VOF or VOF and AIF truncation (n = 7) -30.9 (-41.5 –-12.0) 28.8 (10.7–50.3) 1.7 (-2.9–5.3) -121 (-183 –-61.8) 117 (65.1–122) 2.5 (-53.0–8.8)
Hopsital A (28. mm coverage) (n = 28) -11.9 (-22.6 –-3.6) 12.4 (3.7–22.1) 0.4 (-1.4–3.1) -89.4 (-164 –-31.2) 44.6 (16.9–72.6) 1.0 (-15.0–4.2)
Hospital B (40 mm to 80 mm coverage (n = 8) -16.1 (-47.9 –-6.0) 13.7 (7.1–46.7) -0.0 (-5.0–1.7) -57.3 (-101 –-31.8) 22.5 (6.5–37.5) 0.2 (-3.9–1.2)

* truncation as assessed on the 48 seconds image data.