. 2014 Oct 6;40(3):297–308. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu083

Table IV.

Indirect Effects of Group on Social Behavior via Effortful Control Using Parent Report Data

Predictor	Coefficient	Standard error	P	Coefficient for indirect effect via EC ^a	95% bootstrap CI for the indirect effect
Outcome: Leadership-popularity R² = .155; F(3, 136) = 8.326, p < .001
Group	−0.649	0.151	<.001	−.019	−0.112 to 0.027
EC	0.093	0.134	.491
SES	0.004	0.004	.278
Outcome: Prosocial R² = .107; F(3, 136) = 5.453, p < .001
Group	0.074	0.154	.630	−.094	−0.224 to −0.013
EC	0.464	0.137	<.001
SES	0.004	0.004	.274
Outcome: Aggressive-disruptive R² = .124; F(3, 136) = 6.387, p < .001
Group	−0.373	0.149	.013	.100	0.021 to 0.249
EC	−0.494	0.132	<.001
SES	−0.002	0.004	.641
Outcome: Sensitive-isolated R² = .147; F(3, 136) = 7.798, p < .001
Group	0.754	0.175	<.001	.020	−0.027 to 0.116
EC	−0.096	0.156	.537
SES	−0.003	0.004	.456
Outcome: Victimization R² = .078; F(3, 136) = 3.816, p = .012
Group	0.458	0.187	.016	.051	−0.006 to 0.177
EC	−0.250	0.166	.134
SES	−0.001	0.004	.760

Note. Group = Brain tumor survivors (1) versus Comparison classmates (0); EC = Effortful Control subscale of the EATQ-R; SES based on parental occupational prestige.

^aCoefficient for group =−0.203, p = .034 in model predicting ECS with SES as a covariate.