Table 2.
Testing time-on-task in terms of trial types
Variable | Coefficient (as % difference) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7† | Model 8 | |
In terms of trial types | ||||
Foreperiod | ||||
=1.0 s | 5.25*** | 4.91*** | 7.16*** | 7.22** |
=1.5 s | −2.42 | |||
≥1.5 s | −4.97 | |||
≥2.0 s | −4.04 | |||
Hazard rate | ||||
=high | 37.79*** | 36.41*** | 40.75*** | 49.19*** |
Time-on-task trial type | ||||
{Z = late} | −7.35 | |||
Interactions | ||||
{Z = late} × {HR = high} | −1.24** | −1.12* | −.97** | |
{Z = late} × {HR = low} | −12.49* | −12.56* | −12.72* |
Estimated differences were given by GLIRT coefficients represented as percentage change in v value (perceptual processing speed) per explanatory variable unit increase on average across subjects and sessions. Time-on-task is represented in terms of early and late trial types
†Model 7 wins the model selection. Further nesting to Model 8 was rejected, p < .005
*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .005