Skip to main content
. 2014 May 4;79(3):425–431. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0570-8

Table 2.

Testing time-on-task in terms of trial types

Variable Coefficient (as  % difference)
Model 5 Model 6 Model 7† Model 8
In terms of trial types
Foreperiod
 =1.0 s 5.25*** 4.91*** 7.16*** 7.22**
 =1.5 s −2.42
 ≥1.5 s −4.97
 ≥2.0 s −4.04
Hazard rate
 =high 37.79*** 36.41*** 40.75*** 49.19***
Time-on-task trial type
 {Z = late} −7.35
Interactions
 {Z = late} × {HR = high} −1.24** −1.12* −.97**
 {Z = late} × {HR = low} −12.49* −12.56* −12.72*

Estimated differences were given by GLIRT coefficients represented as percentage change in v value (perceptual processing speed) per explanatory variable unit increase on average across subjects and sessions. Time-on-task is represented in terms of early and late trial types

Model 7 wins the model selection. Further nesting to Model 8 was rejected, p < .005

*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .005