Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 22;86(1):63–70. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.984113

Table 1.

Sex, age, and mode of fixation during 3 time periods for hemiprostheses (HPs), anatomic total prostheses (ATPs), resurfacing prostheses (RPs), and reversed total prostheses (RTPs)

Variable Time period HP n = 2,447 ATP n = 444 RP n = 454 RTP n = 828
Sex, % women
 1994–1999, n = 737 80 84 71 82
 2000–2005, n = 981 81 45 73 85
 2006–2012, n = 2,455 77 61 57 81
Mean age (SD)
 1994–1999, n = 737 68 (12) 70 (9.3) 64 (15) 67 (11)
 2000–2005, n = 981 71 (11) 64 (14) 68 (11) 71 (11)
 2006–2012, n = 2,455 72 (11) 68 (9.1) 64 (12) 73 (9.4)
Fixation, % a
 1994–1999
Cemented 48 31 98 b 1
Uncemented 52 65 2 96
Hybrid 4 3
 2000–2005
Cemented 70 33 0 11
Uncemented 30 59 100 b 59
Hybrid 8 30
2006–2012
Cemented 75 65 1 4
Uncemented 25 18 99b 40
Hybrid 17 56 c

HP: hemiprosthesis; ATP: anatomic total prosthesis; RP: resurfacing prosthesis; RTP: reversed total prosthesis.

a

Percentage of HPs, TPs, RFs, and RTPs that were cemented, uncemented, or hybrid/inverse hybrid.

b

In the period 1994–1999, only Scan resurfacing prostheses were used and they were all cemented. After this, the Scan prostheses were not used and the new resurfacing prostheses were mainly uncemented.

c

Almost exclusively cemented humeral component and uncemented glenoid component.