Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr;87(4):747–765. doi: 10.1124/mol.114.096495

TABLE 2.

Emax and EC50 values of ligand-modulated [35S]GTPγS binding in CB1-HEK and CB1-HEK–CRIP1a cells

Varying concentrations of the indicated ligands were incubated with membranes prepared from the indicated cell lines in the presence of 10 μM GDP and 0.1 nM [35S]GTPγS, as described in Materials and Methods. Emax and EC50 values were derived from nonlinear regression analysis of ligand concentration-effect curves. Data are mean values ± S.E.M. (n = 3–6). The P values in the rightmost column denote significance of the effect of CRIP1a overexpression, derived from two-way ANOVA (ligand concentration × cell line) of the concentration effect curves. Values <0.05 are considered significant. Significance of Emax and EC50 values between cell lines were determined by Student’s t test.

CB1-HEK CB1-HEK-CRIP1a
Ligand Emax
EC50
Emax
EC50
P value
% Stim nM % Stim nM
2-AGE 137.7 ± 9.7a 59.9 ± 3.8 108.2 ± 3.7a,* 104 ± 16 <0.0001
HU210 114.6 ± 5.9a,b 0.04 ± 0.01 96.0 ± 6.1b,§ 0.06 ± 0.01 <0.0001
WIN55,212-2 112.7 ± 8.8a,b,c 110 ± 41 79.5 ± 1.7c,* 90.6 ± 6.2 <0.0001
CP55,940 100.0 ± 8.7b,c 48.8 ± 2.2 72.0 ± 2.7c,* 51.4 ± 6.3 <0.0001
MAEA 73.8 ± 6.1c 202 ± 37 73.0 ± 6.0c 255 ± 40 0.4928
Levonantradol 73.7 ± 11.3c 34.2 ± 8.6 72.8 ± 0.5c 19.0 ± 5.2 0.2360
THC 19.6 ± 2.7d 11.5 ± 2.4 20.4 ± 3.1d 8.1 ± 1.2 0.1740
Rimonabant −12.9 ± 1.5 1.0 ± 0.4 −6.5 ± 1.5* 0.5 ± 0.1 0.0002
*

P < 0.05 different from CB1-HEK cells. §P = 0.05 different from CB1-HEK cells. adSignificance of Emax and EC50 values between cell lines were determined by Student's t test. Significant differences between ligand Emax values within each cell line are denoted as follows: ligands without any similar letter designations are P < 0.05 different from each other as determined by one-way ANOVA with posthoc Newman-Keuls test.