Table 1.
Modified scoring system used in the interpretation of cytological features
Criteria | Description | Point score | |
---|---|---|---|
Background, blood clot | Large amount | Great compromise to diagnosis | 0 |
Large amount | Diagnosis still possible | 0.5 | |
Moderate | Diagnosis possible | 1 | |
Moderate | Diagnosis evident | 1.5 | |
Minimal | Excellent quality | 2 | |
Amount of cellular material | Absent | Diagnosis not possible | 0 |
Minimal | Diagnosis still possible | 0.5 | |
Moderate | Sufficient for diagnosis | 1 | |
Moderate to abundant | Diagnosis evident | 1.5 | |
Abundant | Diagnosis simple, excellent quality | 2 | |
Degree of cellular degeneration | Marked | Diagnosis impossible | 0 |
Marked | Diagnosis still possible | 0.5 | |
Moderate | Diagnosis possible | 1 | |
Moderate | Diagnosis evident | 1.5 | |
Minimal | Diagnosis easy | 2 | |
Degree of cellular trauma | Marked | Diagnosis impossible | 0 |
Marked | Diagnosis still possible | 0.5 | |
Moderate | Diagnosis possible | 1 | |
Moderate | Diagnosis evident | 1.5 | |
Minimal | Diagnosis easy | 2 | |
Retention of appropriate architectures | Minimal to absent | Diagnosis impossible | 0 |
Minimal | Diagnosis still possible | 0.5 | |
Moderate | Some preservation | 1 | |
Follicles, papillae, acini, flat sheets, syncitia, single cells, etc. | |||
Diagnosis evident | |||
Moderate | Excellent architectural display closely reflecting histological diagnosis | 1.5 | |
Excellent | 2 |