Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 12;15(2):4176–4192. doi: 10.3390/s150204176

Table 3.

Quality metrics for reconstructed images.

Image Method PSNR SSIM

Low-Sampling Mode High-Sampling Mode Low-Sampling Mode High-Sampling Mode
Image 1 [9] 29.96 33.72 0.8463 0.9516
[10] 30.39 33.74 0.8633 0.9517
[4] 30.43 34.94 0.8643 0.9568
ASR-CS-SAR 34.07 37.97 0.9491 0.9734

Image 2 [9] 29.94 31.48 0.9495 0.9605
[10] 29.91 31.35 0.9500 0.9612
[4] 29.92 31.72 0.9494 0.9625
ASR-CS-SAR 32.50 35.28 0.9701 0.9820

Image 3 [9] 32.45 36.69 0.9766 0.9905
[10] 32.49 36.71 0.9766 0.9905
[4] 32.53 36.74 0.9769 0.9907
ASR-CS-SAR 35.02 39.95 0.9845 0.9926

Image 4 [9] 28.51 36.67 0.9810 0.9961
[10] 28.77 36.70 0.9817 0.9961
[4] 28.96 36.74 0.9821 0.9961
ASR-CS-SAR 32.77 40.01 0.9922 0.9984

Image 5 [9] 26.27 31.48 0.9738 0.9887
[10] 26.28 31.53 0.9739 0.9984
[4] 26.30 31.59 0.9743 0.9887
ASR-CS-SAR 31.34 36.03 0.9906 0.9953

Image 6 [9] 26.46 33.06 0.9370 0.9722
[10] 26.63 33.08 0.9379 0.9723
[4] 26.86 33.13 0.9395 0.9724
ASR-CS-SAR 31.86 38.43 0.9634 0.9920

Image 7 [9] 28.87 34.08 0.9396 0.9895
[10] 28.89 34.21 0.9370 0.9899
[4] 28.93 34.28 0.9379 0.9900
ASR-CS-SAR 33.89 40.26 0.9436 0.9965