Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 1;25(2):131–139. doi: 10.1089/cap.2013.0130

Table 2.

Latent Growth Models of Treatment and Maintenance Effects

  Treatment effect      
  Intercept Slope Treatment maintenance
Outcome estimate SE Z score estimate SE Z score Estimate SE Z score
Dyads (n=48)
 BDI 9.99 3.04 3.29** −0.44 0.19 −2.25* 2.73 4.15 0.66
 BSS 4.07 1.58 2.57* −0.09 0.06 −1.47 1.60 0.98 1.62
Parent (n=24)
 BDI 9.83 4.85 2.03* −0.73 0.24 −3.07** 2.62 5.71 0.46
 BSS 2.07 1.81 1.14 −0.5 0.05 −1.08 0.97 1.03 0.94
Adol (n=24)
 BDI 10.16 3.48 2.92** −0.14 0.19 −0.74 1.76 3.92 0.45
 BSS 1.66 1.74 1.52 0.02 0.06 0.32 2.05 1.70 1.20

All composite models test baseline (intercept) and treatment (slope) effects using latent linear growth models, with treatment regressed on intercept and slope processes as well as the 48 month maintenance outcome. Dyad analyses involve multilevel latent growth models of both parent and adolescent outcomes with dyadic membership indicated as the cluster variable.

*

p<0.05, **p<0.01.

BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BSS, Beck Suicide Scale.