Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug;3(4):225–233. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.08.05

Table 3. Overall comparison VAM vs. CM (Studies 1989-2011).

VAM (n=956) CM (n=5,156) P value
Mortality 0 0
Morbidity 0.83-2.9% 0-5.3% NS
No. of LN biopsied 6-8.5 5-7.13 NS
No. LN stations sampled 1.9-3.6 2.6-2.98 NS
Accuracy 87.9-98.9% 83.8-97.2% NS
NPV 83.0-98.6% 81.0-98.7% NS

VAM, videomediastinoscopy; CM, conventional mediastinoscopy; NPV, negative predictive value. Adapted from Zakkar et al. (38).