Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb;4(1):36–54. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.05.01

Table 1. Phase III Trials comparing EGFR-inhibitors to chemotherapy in advanced stage IIIB/IV NSCLC.

Trial [year] (Ref) Patient selection Targeted therapy (TT) Comparator (C) Median PFS TT vs. C (mo.) HR P value
First-line EGFR TKI versus chemotherapy
    IPASS [2009] (39,40) n=1,217, clinical, non/light smokers, Adc, 60% EGFR mutant (Asia) Gefitinib Carboplatin; Paclitaxel 9.8 vs. 6.4 0.48 ≤0.001
    First-SIGNAL [2012] (41) n=309, clinical, never smokers, Adc, 44% EGFR mutant Gefitinib Cisplatin; Gemcitabine 5.8 vs. 6.4 1.198 0.138
    WJTOG3405 [2010] (42) n=172, molecular EGFR mutant Gefitinib Cisplatin; Docetaxel 9.2 vs. 6.3 0.489 <0.0001
    NEJSG [2010] (43) n=230, molecular EGFR mutant Gefitinib Carboplatin; Paclitaxel 10.8 vs. 5.4 0.3 <0.001
    OPTIMAL [2011] (44) n=154, molecular EGFR mutant, 88% Adc Erlotinib Carboplatin; Gemcitabine 13.1 vs. 4.6 0.16 <0.0001
    EURTAC [2012] (45) n=174, molecular EGFR mutant Erlotinib Platinum doublet 9.7 vs. 5.2 0.37 <0.0001
    LUX-Lung3 [2013] (46) n=345, molecular EGFR mutant Adc Afatinib Cisplatin; Pemetrexed 11.1 vs. 6.9 0.58 0.001
    LUX-Lung6 [2014] (47) n=364, molecular EGFR mutant Adc Afatinib Cisplatin; Gemcitabine 11.0 vs. 5.6 0.28 <0.0001
First-line EGFR therapy plus chemotherapy
    INTACT-1 [2004] (48) n=1,093, unselected, Adc + SCC Gefitinib 500 mg/250 mg or placebo + chemotherapy Cisplatin + Gemcitabine (chemotherapy alone) 5.5 (500 mg), 5.8 (250 mg) vs. 6.0 NR 0.7633
    INTACT-2 [2004] (49) n=1,037, unselected, Adc + SCC Gefitinib 500 mg/250 mg or placebo + chemotherapy Carboplatin + Paclitaxel (chemotherapy alone) 4.6 (500 mg), 5.3 (250 mg) vs. 5.0 NR 0.0562
    TRIBUTE [2005] (50) n=1,059, unselected, Adc + SCC Erlotinib + chemotherapy then maintenance Erlotinib Carboplatin; Paclitaxel 5.1 vs. 4.9 0.937 0.36
    TALENT [2007] (51) n=1,172, unselected, Adc + SCC Erlotinib + chemotherapy Cisplatin; Gemcitabine 5.5 vs. 5.7 (23.7 vs. 24.6 wks.) 0.98 0.74
    FLEX [2009] (52) n=1,125, Adc + SCC, EGFR expression Cetuximab + chemotherapy Cisplatin; Vinorelbine 4.8 vs. 4.8 0.943 0.39
    BMS099 [2010] (53) n=676, unselected, Adc + SCC Cetuximab + chemotherapy Carboplatin; Paclitaxel or Docetaxel 4.40 vs. 4.24 0.902 0.2358
    TORCH [2012] (54, 55) n=760, unselected, Adc + SCC Erlotinib (followed by Cisplatin Gemcitabine) Cisplatin Gemcitabine (followed by Erlotinib) 6.4 vs. 8.9 1.21 NR
Second- or third-line EGFR TKI versus placebo
    BR.21 [2005] (56) n=731, unselected, Adc + SCC Erlotinib Placebo 2.2 vs. 1.8 (OS 6.7 vs. 4.7, P<0.001) 0.61 <0.001
    ISEL [2005] (57) n=1,692, unselected, Adc + SCC Gefitinib Placebo 3.0 vs. 2.6 0.82 0.0006
Second or third-line EGFR TKI versus chemotherapy
    INTEREST [2008] (31) n=1,433, unselected, Adc + SCC, EGFR mutant subgroup Gefitinib Docetaxel 2.2 vs. 2.7 1.04 0.47
    V-15-32 [2008] (32) n=489, unselected, Adc + SCC Gefitinib Docetaxel 2.0 vs. 2.0 0.9 0.335
    ISTANA [2010] (33) n=161, unselected, Adc + SCC Gefitinib Docetaxel 3.3 vs. 3.4 (6 months PFS 32% vs. 13%) 0.729 0.04
    TITAN [2012] (34) n=424, unselected, Adc + SCC Erlotinib Docetaxel or Pemetrexed (physician’s choice) 1.4 vs. 1.9 (6.3 vs. 8.6 wks.) 1.19 0.089
    TAILOR [2013] (58) n=222, molecular EGFR wild type, KRAS testing, Adc + SCC Erlotinib Docetaxel 2.9 (Docetaxel) vs. 2.4 (Erlotinib) in EGFR wild type 0.71 0.02

Adc, adenocarcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; PFS, progression-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; mo, months; wks, weeks.