Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb;4(1):36–54. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.05.01

Table 2. Phase III Trials comparing EGFR-inhibitors to chemotherapy in maintenance and adjuvant settings.

Trial [year] (Ref) Patient selection Targeted therapy (TT) Comparator (C) Median PFS TT vs. C (mo.) HR P value
Maintenance
    WJTOG0203 [2010] (61) n=604, unselected, Adc + SCC (EGFR predictive biomarker not known) Gefitinib (in those without PD after 3× cycles platinum doublet) Platinum doublet (up to 6 cycles) 4.6 (Gefitinib) vs. 4.3 (chemo) 0.68 <0.001
    SATURN [2010] (62) n=884, unselected for entry, Adc + SCC, 7% EGFR mutant Erlotinib (in those without PD after 4× cycles platinum doublet) Placebo 2.8 vs. 2.6 (12.3 vs. 11.1 wks.) 0.71 <0.0001
    INFORM [2012] (63) n=296, unselected, Adc + SCC (known EGFR status excluded) Gefitinib (in those without PD after 4× cycles platinum doublet) Placebo 4.8 vs. 2.6 0.42 <0.0001
    IFCT-GFPC 0502 [2012] (64) n=464, unselected, Adc + SCC Erlotinib or Gemcitabine maintenance (in those without PD after 4× cycles cisplatin gemcitabine) Observation 2.9 vs. 1.9 (Erlotinib) 0.69 0.003
3.8 vs. 1.9 (Gemcitabine) 0.56 <0.001
    SWOG S0023 [2008] (65) n=243, unselected, Adc + SCC, closed after unplanned interim analysis after ISEL trial Gefitinib (after chemoradiation and docetaxel in inoperable stage III) Placebo 8.3 vs. 11.7 0.8 0.17
Adjuvant
    BR.19 [2013] (66) n=503, unselected, Adc + SCC, closed after unplanned interim analysis after ISEL trial Gefitinib (after completely resected stage IB, II or IIIA NSCLC) Placebo 50.4 vs. not yet reached (4.2 years vs. not yet reached) 1.22 0.15

Adc, adenocarcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; PFS, progression-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; mo, months; wks, weeks.