Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb;4(1):67–81. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.11.06

Table 1. Response rates to second and third generation EGFR TKIs in clinical trials.

Agent Study Prior chemo-therapy Prior EGFR TKI therapy EGFR mutation required No. of pts with EGFR mutation ORR (in all pts, %) No. pts with T790M ORR (in T790M+ pts, %)
Second generation TKI
   Neratinib NCT00266877 (127) Yes & no Yes & no No 91 3 12 0
   Afatinib LUX-Lung 3 (128) No No Yes 345 56 NR NR
LUX-Lung 6 (129,130) No No Yes 242 67 NR NR
LUX-Lung 2 (131) Yes & no No Yes 129 61 1 NR
LUX-Lung 1 (132) Yes ≥12 weeks E/G No 62 7 4 NR
LUX-Lung 4 (133) Yes ≥12 weeks E/G No 56 8 2 NR
LUX-Lung 5 (134) Yes ≥12 weeks A No NR 32 NR NR
   Afatinib + cetuximab NCT01090011 (135) Yes Yes Yes 126 29 71 32
   Dacomitinib ARCHER 1009 (136) Yes Yes No 47 11 NR NR
BR26 (137) Yes Yes No 157 7 NR NR
Third generation TKI
   AZD9291 NCT01802632 (138) Yes Yes Yes 199 55 132 64
   HM61713 NCT01588145 (139) Yes Yes Yes 93 17 27 66
   CO-1686 NCT01526928 (140) Yes Yes Yes 88 58* 55 58*

pts, patients; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; NR, not reported; ORR, objective response rate; E/G, erlotinib/gefitinib; A, afatinib; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; *, ORR was calculated from phase 2 which included only T790M+ pts.