Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0119983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119983

Table 3. Multiple comparisons between diabetic patients without complications and diabetic patients with micro and macro-complications.

T2DM- without complication T2DM+* with micro complications T2DM+** with macro complications T2DM+* vs T2DM+**
Mean(SD) Mean(SD) Mean(SD)
P value P value P value P value
Males N = 113 N = 101 N = 88
Peaks (structure)
P1 (NGA2F) 9.63 (3.39) 9.89 (3.38) 9.54 (2.84)
ns
P2 (NGA2FB) 1.78 (0.58) 1.84 (0.88) 1.9 (0.55)
ns
P3 (NG1(6)A2F) 5.34 (1.39) 5.28 (1.37) 4.86 (1.29)
P = 0.01 ns
P4 (NG1(3)A2F) 4.88 (0.91) 4.87 (1.2) 4.67 (0.9)
ns
P5 (NA2) 43.97 (4.97) 44.28 (5.02) 44.58 (4.53)
ns
P6 (NA2F) 17.49 (2.41) 17.38 (2.83) 17.47 (2.3)
ns
P7 (NA2FB) 6.03 (1.65) 5.97 (1.8) 6.65 (2.5)
ns
P8 (NA3) 6.68 (1.74) 6.29 (1.69) 6.13 (1.77)
ns
P9 (NA3F) 2.83 (1.02) 2.85 (1.14) 2.91 (0.97)
ns
P10 (NA4) 1.37 (0.45) 1.33 (0.4) 1.29 (0.43)
ns

For each peak the mean and the SD are indicated. The reference group in each comparison is T2DM-. For each comparison the nominal p-value is reported if < = 0.05.