Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroinformatics. 2012 Jan;10(1):67–80. doi: 10.1007/s12021-011-9125-y

Table 1.

First Author Year Sample Size (n) Percent Male Age mean (min, max) MNI (x, y, z) Talairach (x, y, z) SPI value SPI unit r d g Brodmann Area
Altamura 2007 18 0.61 27 (7, 17, 48) (4.9, 9.9, 48.5) 8 z 0.99 12.43 12.08 6
Audoin 2005 18 . 25 (−19, 10, 63) (−19.6, −1.1, 65.9) 4 t 0.70 1.94 1.89 6
Baumann 2007 13 0.54 25 (20, 28) . . . . 0 0 0 .
Bedwell 2005 14 0.57 29 (22, 40) (−55, 4, 37) (−52.9, −3, 39.5) 8.03 t 0.91 4.45 4.29 6
Beneventi 2007 12 0.50 (21, 29) (0, 21, 43) (−1.5, 14.1, 44.3) 6.53 z 0.99 13.10 12.54 6
Braver 1997 8 0.75 (18, 25) (37, 37, 33) (37, 37, 33) 5.24 z 0.99 13.46 12.59 9
Breitenstein 2005 14 0.57 (19, 26) (36, 27, −6) (32.8, 24.7, 2.2) 4.31 z 0.86 3.39 3.27 47
Bunge 2001 16 0.81 27 (18, 40) (−42, −2, 32) (−40.3, −6.2, 31.8) 3.76 z 0.77 2.38 2.31 6
Cabeza 2002 20 0.65 23 (−45, 0, 36) (−43.6, −6.7, 38.1) 7.8 t 0.87 3.58 3.49 6
Cairo 2004 18 0.44 28 (18, 35) (−12, 2, 56) (−12.8, −4.7, 54.1) 7.02 z 0.97 7.92 7.70 6
Caldwell 2005 8 1.00 36 (30, 43) (−48, 20, 0) (−45.4, 17.1, 5.1) 19.46 t 0.99 14.71 13.76 45
Chang 2004 10 1.00 14 (10, 17) (4, 24, 44) (2.2, 14.9, 49.9) 4.37 z 0.93 5.17 4.90 8
Chen 2004 8 1.00 28 (−50, 0, 32) (−48.1, −3.4, 31.8) 6 t 0.91 4.54 4.24 6
Cohen 1994 12 0.58 (20, 29) (−36, 33, 13) (−36, 33, 13) 7.2 t 0.91 4.34 4.16 46
Cohen 1997 10 0.50 (18, 34) (37, 32, 30) (37, 32, 30) 3.82 z 0.89 3.84 3.65 9
Cross 2007 27 0.59 21 (−10, −2, 56) (−10.9, −8.5, 53.7) 4.16 t 0.63 1.63 1.60 6
Deckersbach 2008 17 0.00 26 (−46, −4, 42) (−44.1, −8.9, 40.5) 4.39 z 0.82 2.91 2.82 4
Desmond 2003 13 1.00 56 (0, 7, 64) (−1.8, −4.2, 66.8) 4.07 z 0.85 3.28 3.16 6
Dohnel 2008 16 0.50 61 (9, 38, 31) (7, 30.9, 35.3) 4.61 z 0.86 3.37 3.26 6
Dolcos 2006 15 0.00 22 (18, 31) (46, 38, 22) (46, 38, 22) 9.6 t 0.93 5.13 4.96 46
Frangou 2008 7 0.29 39 (52, 12, 40) (46.7, 5.7, 41.6) 17.52 t 0.99 14.31 13.24 6
Grosbras 2001 10 0.00 (22, 30) (−32, −8, 64) (−31.4, −14.6, 60) 10.63 z 0.999 1014.97 962.89 6
Gruber 2010 18 0.39 34 (−48, −4, 44) (−46, −9.1, 42.3) 7 t 0.86 3.40 3.30 4
Hamilton 2009 38 0.61 33 (18, 64) (50, 28, 28) (46.3, 23.5, 30.4) 7.62 z 0.88 3.77 3.72 9
Harvey 2005 10 0.50 29 (18, 42) (−45, 18, 21) (−42.9, 13.4, 23.7) 10.91 t 0.96 7.27 6.90 10
Hautzel 2002 17 1.00 26 (−48, 8, 28) (−45.8, 3.5, 29.1) 17.19 t 0.97 8.60 8.34 9
Heide 2001 6 . (27, 41) (−48, −4, 40) (−45.9, −8.8, 38.7) 7.39 z 0.999 455.82 416.10 6
Jeong 2005 10 0.20 30 (16, 45) (−27, −21, 54) (−25, −29.4, 52.8) 3.38 z 0.84 3.06 2.90 4
Johnson 2006 18 0.83 37 (−50, 2, 44) (−48.3, −5.9, 46) 4.9 t 0.77 2.38 2.31 4
Kanayama 2004 10 0.60 28 (54, 20, 32) (48.6, 13.8, 35.2) 6.66 t 0.91 4.44 4.21 9
Kirschen 2005 16 0.44 25 (−63.4, 4.6, 14.5) (−60.5, 0.9, 17.7) 4.25 z 0.82 2.91 2.82 6
Koch 2007 13 0.62 27 (42, 25, 34) (37.8, 17, 41) 8.51 t 0.93 4.91 4.72 8
Koch 2007 40 0.53 31.5 (−6, 30, 56) (−7.2, 21.3, 56.6) 6.02 t 0.69 1.93 1.90 6
Koppelstaetter 2008 15 1.00 (25, 47) (−40, 32, 17) (−38.6, 26.6, 24.3) 16.61 t 0.98 8.88 8.58 46
Koshino 2008 11 0.91 29 (18, 40) (−36, 4, 30) (−34.7, −0.5, 30.7) 13.44 t 0.97 8.50 8.10 6
Kumari 2006 13 1.00 33 (18, 55) (36, 8, 46) (31.8, 1.5, 46.4) 7.34 t 0.90 4.24 4.07 6
Lagopoulos 2007 10 0.00 32 (20, 54) (46, 24, −2) (41.6, 20.6, 5.1) 6.07 z 0.99 14.64 13.89 45
Landau 2004 10 . (22, 27) . . . . 0 0 0 .
LoPresti 2008 19 0.32 23 (20, 26) (−46, 26, −6) (−43.5, 23.2, 0.3) 7.84 t 0.88 3.70 3.60 47
Malisza 2005 14 0.57 . . . . . 0 0 0 .
Matsuo 2007 15 0.40 38 (−30, 0, 46) (−29.6, −3.4, 44.5) 6.23 z 0.97 7.39 7.14 6
Meisenzahl 2006 12 0.92 34 (22, 48) (48, 11, 23) (43.6, 5.2, 28.5) 8.34 t 0.93 5.03 4.82 9
Mendrek 2004 8 0.75 28 (48, 8, 32) (34, 2.7, 34.1) 5.88 z 0.99 22.52 21.06 6
Mendrek 2005 12 0.75 28 (−44, −4, 36) (−42.2, −8.4, 35.2) 5.27 z 0.96 6.46 6.18 6
Mu 2005 10 1.00 28 (−56, 14, 30) (−53.2, 8.9, 31.3) 11.72 t 0.97 7.81 7.41 9
Mu 2005 33 1.00 29 (18, 45) (−48, 2, 24) (−45.7, −1.8, 25) 9.47 t 0.86 3.35 3.30 9
Neuner 2007 15 1.00 33 (−42, 6, 30) (−40.2, 1.4, 30.8) 6.5 z 0.97 8.42 8.13 6
Nystrom 2000 8 0.75 22 (18, 25) (47, 33, 18) (47, 33, 18) 2.65 z 0.79 2.55 2.38 46
Petit 1998 5 1.00 (21, 27) (18, 4, 48) (18, 4, 48) 4.3 z 0.99 19.78 17.69 6
Pochon 2001 8 0.50 (20, 25) (27, 3, 51) (23.4, −3.5, 50.3) 3.88 z 0.94 5.28 4.94 6
Pochon 2002 6 0.67 (18, 30) (−39, 54, 12) (−37.1, 47.7, 19) 6.35 t 0.94 5.68 5.18 10
Prado 2007 20 0.35 21 (19, 26) (45, 16, 27) (40.7, 9.4, 33.1) 5.89 z 0.91 4.36 4.25 9
Quintana 2003 8 0.75 29 (−50, 14, 0) (−50, 14, 0) 7.14 z 0.999 72.90 68.20 .
Ragland 2002 11 0.55 32 (21, 53) (36, 18, 28) (36, 18, 28) 5.1 z 0.96 6.73 6.42 9
Ragland 2004 15 0.60 28 (−48, 18, 28) (−48, 18, 28) 3.8 z 0.79 2.56 2.47 9
Ricciardi 2006 6 1.00 28 (0, 4, 52) (0, 4, 52) 7 z 0.999 260.05 237.39 6
Rowe 2000 6 0.83 (24, 34) (−22, 8, 60) (−22.1, 0.6, 58) 6.42 t 0.94 5.74 5.24 6
Rypma 1999 6 0.33 25 (−52, 1, 32) (−52, 1, 32) 3.28 z 0.94 5.37 4.90 6
Rypma 2001 6 0.33 25 (22, 29) (25, 53, 1) (25, 53, 1) 4.07 z 0.98 9.98 9.11 10
Sanchez-Carrion 2008 14 0.79 24 (24, 4, 62) (20.5, −3.6, 60.1) 16.67 t 0.98 9.25 8.91 6
Schmidt 2009 25 1.00 34 (26, 12, 54) (22.4, 4.6, 53.7) 8.37 t 0.86 3.42 3.35 6
Sevostianov 2002 14 0.57 (19, 44) . . . . 0 0 0 .
Shamosh 2008 103 0.43 23 (18, 40) . . . . 0 0 0 .
Sheridan 2007 10 0.00 15 (12, 17) (30, 38, 16) (26.6, 32.1, 22.2) 5.97 t 0.89 3.98 3.78 9
Shikata 2003 9 0.56 27 (−30, −12, 57) (−29.5, −17.8, 53.4) 4.14 z 0.93 5.24 4.94 6
Simmons 2005 9 0.33 (18, 45) (−21, 33, −18) (−20.2, 30.6, −9.4) 6.6 t 0.92 4.67 4.40 47
Smith 2006 10 0.00 57 (50, 60) (−5, 14, 47) (−6.2, 7.2, 47.2) 5.74 z 0.99 11.73 11.13 37
Sowell 2007 16 0.4375 11 (7, 15) . . . . 0 0 0 .
Tan 2006 26 0.69 32 (44, 23, 27) (39.4, 17.1, 30.9) 2.81 z 0.50 1.16 1.14 9
Veltman 2003 22 0.32 23 (−51, 12, 36) (−48.6, 6.5, 36.5) 5.7 z 0.88 3.68 3.60 9
Vinogradov 2008 8 0.50 28 (25, 33) (−10, 48, 18) (−10.5, 41.5, 28) 4.5 z 0.97 7.90 7.39 9
Volle 2005 11 0.64 28 (22, 34) (−33, −3, 60) (−32.3, −9.6, 56.9) 3.69 z 0.85 3.25 3.10 6
Walter 2007 17 . 27 (−51, 3, 36) (−48.6, −1.9, 35.7) 5.04 z 0.88 3.76 3.65 6
Yoo 2005 10 0.80 23 (20, 30) (30, 14, 53) (26.2, 6.5, 53.1) 4.07 z 0.91 4.39 4.17 6

Descriptive statistics of each study (n=74), the corresponding SPI value, unit, and corresponding Pearson’s r (used for plotting), and Cohen’s d value used to assess publication bias. Hedge’s g estimates are provided for reference.