Skip to main content
. 2014 May 21;70(10):2339–2352. doi: 10.1111/jan.12444

Table 3.

Uncertain risk factors

Uncertain risk factors Key discussion points
Friction and shear • Important concept in relation to biomechanics and tissue loading
• Debate about whether a patient characteristic
• Difficult to measure in practice
• Different definition of terms (e.g. nurses and bioengineers)
• Interlinked with immobility
• Should to be minimized in care
Acute illness Infection Body temperature (elements of general health status) • Felt to be important clinically
• Links between the 3 elements recognized
• Impact on mobility, perfusion and moisture acknowledged
Chronic wound • Did not emerge as a strong risk factor in the systematic review
• Link to other factors including nutritional depletion, moisture(exudate), oedema, diabetes and general skin condition recognized
• Would be captured by other key risk factors e.g. general ‘skin status’, nutrition, moisture and diabetes
Pitting oedema • Relatively unexplored area in the literature
• Leads to changes in the mechanical properties of the tissues
• May result in reduced mobility due to heavy oedematous legs
• Some felt that oedema should be considered under the skin status umbrella
Medication • Acknowledged that the systematic review evidence associated with medication was weak.
• Links between specific medications and risk factors were made, e.g. the effects of sedation, epidurals and analgesia on sensation and movement and steroids on skin condition (tissue paper skin)
• Use of vasoconstrictors in specialist areas important
• Complicated by dose-dependent effects
• Difficult to measure
Age • Some felt that age formed an important element of assessment
• Others felt it was a proxy for other measures e.g. skin condition and immobility