Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120870

Fig 3. Effects of stimulus variance on confidence.

Fig 3

In both panels each point is an individual observer. (A) The percentage of equal performance pairs in which the low variance stimulus was associated with higher confidence, calculated separately for session 1 and session 2. Individual estimates are aligned on the diagonal, showing that they were consistent across the two sessions. (B) The more the stimulus variance affected performance (x-axis: threshold elevation), the more it affected confidence (y-axis: amplitude, i.e. deviation from 50%, of the mean bias).